2015
DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.4672
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

89Zr-cetuximab PET imaging in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Abstract: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (mCRC). Approximately 50% of patients benefit despite patient selection for RAS wild type (wt) tumors. Based on the hypothesis that tumor targeting is required for clinical benefit of anti-EGFR treatment, biodistribution and tumor uptake of 89Zr-cetuximab by Positron Emission Tomography (PET), combining the sensitivity of PET with the specificity of cetuximab for EGFR was eva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
92
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the results in advanced colorectal cancer [25], where also 6 days post-injection was described as optimal imaging time point. The imaging time point did not influence the average peak or maximum uptake; the improvement in TBR between the time points is due to a decrease in background activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in agreement with the results in advanced colorectal cancer [25], where also 6 days post-injection was described as optimal imaging time point. The imaging time point did not influence the average peak or maximum uptake; the improvement in TBR between the time points is due to a decrease in background activity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…a large number of extratumoral receptor molecules has to be saturated before tumor receptor molecules can be imaged. In such cases, simultaneous injection of cold doses of mAbs with radiolabeled mAbs is needed to improve image quality [22,23]. However, co-injection of cold mAbs also affects the quantification of tumor uptake as tumor target molecules become occupied with cold mAbs, thus decreasing accuracy of quantification.…”
Section: Immuno-petmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study did not investigate the predictive value of tracer uptake. The other clinical study was performed by Menke et al in 10 KRAS wild type colorectal cancer patients using a co-injection of [ 89 Zr]cetuximab and cold cetuximab [23]. Patients underwent 6 serial PET scans from 1 h to 10 days post injection.…”
Section: Egfrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many factors have been suggested for this mismatch, including perfusion rates, vascularity, vascular permeability, interstitial pressure and mAb plasma half-life [17]. Circulating HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) and trastuzumab are known to form complexes, which are swiftly cleared by the liver [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%