2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023456319134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Job neglect was measured using four items from Kidwell and Robie (2003) Withholding Effort Scales. The instrument uses a five point Likert-type scale measuring the frequency with which participants carried out the behaviors presented in the items (1 = Never to 5 = All the time).…”
Section: Job Neglectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job neglect was measured using four items from Kidwell and Robie (2003) Withholding Effort Scales. The instrument uses a five point Likert-type scale measuring the frequency with which participants carried out the behaviors presented in the items (1 = Never to 5 = All the time).…”
Section: Job Neglectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Withholding effort on the job was assessed with statements that evaluate ''social loafing'' (3 items), ''job neglect'' (5 items), and ''shirking'' (2 items) (Kidwell and Robie, 2003). Example items from these dimensions included ''I give less effort than other members of the work group,'' ''I take more and longer breaks than I should'' and ''I give less than 100 percent effort on my job.''…”
Section: Withholding Effortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend this line of research to a specific type of misbehavior -''withholding effort'' in job-related tasks (Bennett and Naumann, 2005;Kidwell and Bennett, 1993;Kidwell and Robie, 2003) and consider how elements of group climate as well as effort-performance expectancies and job satisfaction affect employee effort levels. Withholding effort in the work group is an important ethical issue because intentional actions to lower effort can adversely affect co-workers' perceptions of equity and justice (Bennett and Naumann, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas many questionnaires measuring social loafing exist (e.g., George, 1992;Kidwell & Robie, 2003;or Liden et al, 2004), there are no instruments for coding behavioural social loafing in group situations. However, the act4teams coding scheme (e.g., Kauffeld, 2006a;Kauffeld & Lehmann-Willenbrock, 2012;Kauffeld & Meyers, 2009) has one category, denial of responsibility, which operationalizes verbal loafing behaviour very closely, as we explain later.…”
Section: Social Loafingmentioning
confidence: 99%