2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(14)60804-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

816 Are urological patients at increased risks of developing haemostatic complications following shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for solitary unilateral kidney stones?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, following TURBT, changes to selective biological markers, such as total protein, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, total leukocytes, neutrophils, haemoglobin, erythrocytes, fibrinogen, and plasma viscosity were reported. Our group, BCUHB North Wales Clinical Research Centre (UK), have recently reported of similar changes to several routine blood parameters following shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS), for the treatment of kidney stones (13,14,16,17). Collectively, these changes in various blood parameters may therefore play an intrinsic role toward the 'normal' response following routine urological procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Specifically, following TURBT, changes to selective biological markers, such as total protein, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, total leukocytes, neutrophils, haemoglobin, erythrocytes, fibrinogen, and plasma viscosity were reported. Our group, BCUHB North Wales Clinical Research Centre (UK), have recently reported of similar changes to several routine blood parameters following shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and flexible ureterorenoscopy (FURS), for the treatment of kidney stones (13,14,16,17). Collectively, these changes in various blood parameters may therefore play an intrinsic role toward the 'normal' response following routine urological procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…We have previously reported on the safety and efficacy and changes to routine and novel biomarkers following various urological and other surgical procedures [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The present study intends to build on previous work and to consider the association between various physiological, surgical and clinical outcome measures following FURS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%