2013
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8278(13)60806-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

804 Exposure–response Analyses of Asunaprevir in Combination With Daclatasvir Peginterferon/ Ribavirin Among Patients With Genotype 1 Chronic HCV Infection: Dose Selection for Phase 3 Clinical Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ALT elevations that did occur were reversible and not associated with hepatic decompensation. This is consistent with other studies showing that ALT increases are infrequently observed with ASV given at recommended doses (100‐mg softgel capsule twice daily or 200‐mg tablet twice daily) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…ALT elevations that did occur were reversible and not associated with hepatic decompensation. This is consistent with other studies showing that ALT increases are infrequently observed with ASV given at recommended doses (100‐mg softgel capsule twice daily or 200‐mg tablet twice daily) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Although the number of subjects with cirrhosis was limited, the difference in plasma exposure in subjects with compensated cirrhosis did not appear to be clinically meaningful, as virological outcomes in these subjects were comparable to those in subjects without cirrhosis. In Phase III studies with the DUAL regimen, only 3% of subjects had experienced Grade 3/4 AST or ALT elevations, consistent with findings from a previous exposure–response analysis that suggested minimal increase in the probability of liver safety events, with an approximate doubling of ASV AUC at the clinically relevant dose [ 25 , 26 ]. On the other hand, subjects receiving the DUAL treatment had in general reduced AST levels as a result of viral clearance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This higher dose will provide additional benefit by mitigating for food effects, acid modifiers, CYP3A4 inducers, and suboptimal adherence 37. In addition, the 60 mg dose is predicted to maximise antiviral response in more difficult-to-treat populations, such as cirrhotic patients, or those with genotype 1a infection, a high baseline viral load, or a non-CC IL28B genotype 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%