2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30199-8_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

802.11 Link Quality and Its Prediction – An Experimental Study

Abstract: Reliable link quality prediction is an imperative for the efficient operation of mobile ad-hoc wireless networks (MANETs). In this paper it is shown that popular link quality prediction algorithms for 802.11 MANETs perform much more poorly when applied in real urban environments than they do in corresponding simulations. Our measurements show that the best performing prediction algorithm failed to predict between 18 and 54 percent of the total observed packet loss in the real urban environments examined. Moreo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(80 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason we suggest a simple predictor that does not rely on node speed measurements. We observed in our real-world evaluation of LQP algorithms [32] that algorithms based only on the signal-power trend performed much more poorly than algorithms that relied on the local average signal power values only. We therefore propose simply using the most recent estimate of the local mean power as the signal-power prediction i.e.…”
Section: -97)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…For this reason we suggest a simple predictor that does not rely on node speed measurements. We observed in our real-world evaluation of LQP algorithms [32] that algorithms based only on the signal-power trend performed much more poorly than algorithms that relied on the local average signal power values only. We therefore propose simply using the most recent estimate of the local mean power as the signal-power prediction i.e.…”
Section: -97)mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The further the transmitter is, the lower is the received power. This assumes we are in a free space (without obstacles) (for dense urban areas, the parameters of the protocol will need to be adjusted since shadowing plays an important role as discussed in [8]). The received power measure is delivered by the wireless interface, and should be transmitted to the routing protocol.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the reviewed protocols were evaluated in their proposing papers 5, 7–12 via simulations in which deterministic transmission ranges were assumed and only path loss (according to the two‐ray ground model) was assumed to affect received signal powers. This can be realistic for simulations of an open field environment 15, but in a suburban or urban setting, shadowing, caused by buildings, cars and people can have a significant effect on the received signal strength 15. As the obstacles causing shadowing in a receiver's environment move, or the receiving node itself moves, the received signal strength fluctuates.…”
Section: Background On Qar and Ac Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%