1946
DOI: 10.1039/jr9460000404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

80. The determination of “active” hydrogen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
1

Year Published

1970
1970
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical absorbances of the diluted solutions were measured by a Beckmann DU model G 2400 spectrophotometer at 380 nm. The molar extinction coefficient of pNA in water was taken to be 12 800 (15). Saturation at a given temperature was attained in all solvents within 7-10 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical absorbances of the diluted solutions were measured by a Beckmann DU model G 2400 spectrophotometer at 380 nm. The molar extinction coefficient of pNA in water was taken to be 12 800 (15). Saturation at a given temperature was attained in all solvents within 7-10 days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the spectroscopic analysis the value IS assumed to be lo6 for extended a-electron systems. A method of calculating the value of efheory from the molecular volume of the n-electron system was developed by Braude [28,29]. In Braude's method, the maximum theoretical extinction coefficient is calculated from of &theory .…”
Section: Microelectrode Determination Of the Aggregation Of Sunset Yementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of a, the probability of a photon being absorbed by a monomer, can be determined from [28,29] where cexP is the extinction coefficient, when Beer-Lambert law is obeyed, and sfheorY is the maximum theoretical extinction coefficient of an absorbing species, which for dye molecules is thought to be around 105-106 [28,29]. For the present aggregation model, it was assumed to be lo6 for dyes with extended a-electron systems by Pugh et al The assumption of the value of cfheorY is a potential weakness of the theory because of the sensitivity of a to its value.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Determination Of the Aggregation Of Sunset Yelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid curve represents (-H o -C HC1 ) from the data of Braude and Stern. 46 where /?+(s) and R+(vs) are the empirical radius corrections specific to the non-aqueous solvent and to water, respectively. In this manner, Keopp, Wendt and Strehlow 50 calculated the values of AG° of the rubidium ion (less rigorously termed the free energies of transfer of Rb + from water to the solvent) for several non-aqueous media.…”
Section: Calculations Based On Modified Born Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%