Nuclear Charge Radii
DOI: 10.1007/10856314_82
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

80-Hg Mercury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 35 , but different methods (i.e., DHF vs. MP2, respectively), which lead to different results. In addition, there are suggestions that calculated results of Hg-bearing species used the mean square nuclear charge radii of Fricke and Heilig 41 are closer to the experiment results 35 . Note that different versions of the calculation software package (i.e., DIRAC04 and DIRAC13.1) have little impact on the calculated results (see Table S6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“… 35 , but different methods (i.e., DHF vs. MP2, respectively), which lead to different results. In addition, there are suggestions that calculated results of Hg-bearing species used the mean square nuclear charge radii of Fricke and Heilig 41 are closer to the experiment results 35 . Note that different versions of the calculation software package (i.e., DIRAC04 and DIRAC13.1) have little impact on the calculated results (see Table S6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Schauble 4 used the nuclear charge radii of Angeli 42 (i.e., <r 2 > 1/2 of 202 Hg and 198 Hg are 5.4633fm and 5.4466fm) and the nuclear charge radius difference (δ<r 2 > = <r 2 > A −<r 2 > A′ ) is 0.182fm 2 . But we use the nuclear charge radii from Fricke and Heilig 41 (i.e., <r 2 > 1/2 of 202 Hg and 198 Hg are 5.462fm and 5.443fm) and the nuclear charge radius difference (δ<r 2 > = <r 2 > A −<r 2 > A′ ) is 0.207fm 2 . Our results are roughly 1.137 times of those of Schauble 4 , consistent with the radii difference ratio, i.e., 0.207/0.182 = 1.137.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…NVF is related to the nuclear charge radii of the Hg isotopes which do not scale linearly with mass, 272 therefore, NVF is associated with mass independent fractionation (MIF). The expected mass 273 independent enrichment in E 199 Hg is calculated from the cationic enrichment factor of the nuclear 274 volume component (ε 202 Hg NVF ) using the scaling factors of 199/198 Hg relative to 202/198 Hg, 23 where SF MDF 275 is the kinetic mass dependent scaling factor of 0.252 and SF NVF is the nuclear volume scaling factor of 276 0.0525 using nuclear charge radii from Landolt-Boernstein: 55 277 Ε ଵଽଽ Hg = (ε ଶଶ Hg × SF ) − (ε ଶଶ Hg × SF ୈ ) (9) 278 Table 1, Table S2). This discrepancy between the experimental findings and the theoretical calculations for the Hg species is not yet fully understood.…”
Section: Possible Hg Isotope Fractionation Mechanisms Previous Studimentioning
confidence: 99%