2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

8-month-old infants' ability to process word order is shaped by the amount of exposure

Abstract: In the majority of languages, the functional distinction between functors and content words correlates with lower-level, perceptually observable properties. Functors are generally more frequent and prosodically more minimal than content words. Previous studies demonstrate that the frequency distribution and the different acoustic realization of frequent and infrequent words guide infants in discovering their native word order. However, whether and if yes, how the exact frequency ratio impacts infants' ability … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…consisted of a strict alternation of frequent (i.e., ge, fi) and infrequent elements (e.g., bi, ru, do …), mimicking functors and content words, respectively (panel A in left table ). Frequent tokens were ninefold more frequent than infrequent tokens [4][5][6]19,32] in all but one study [25] in which they were only threefold more frequent (A). Some artificial languages additionally included the prosodic patterns marking phrasal prominence in natural languages: alternating elements with higher versus lower pitch (224 versus 200 Hz) [5], as in functor-final (FF) languages (B), or alternating short and long elements (120 versus 144 ms) [5,19,25], as in functor-initial (FI) languages (C,D).…”
Section: Figure 2 Graphical Depiction Of the Manipulations Of Familiarization (Left Table) And Test (Right Table) Carried Out Across Infamentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…consisted of a strict alternation of frequent (i.e., ge, fi) and infrequent elements (e.g., bi, ru, do …), mimicking functors and content words, respectively (panel A in left table ). Frequent tokens were ninefold more frequent than infrequent tokens [4][5][6]19,32] in all but one study [25] in which they were only threefold more frequent (A). Some artificial languages additionally included the prosodic patterns marking phrasal prominence in natural languages: alternating elements with higher versus lower pitch (224 versus 200 Hz) [5], as in functor-final (FF) languages (B), or alternating short and long elements (120 versus 144 ms) [5,19,25], as in functor-initial (FI) languages (C,D).…”
Section: Figure 2 Graphical Depiction Of the Manipulations Of Familiarization (Left Table) And Test (Right Table) Carried Out Across Infamentioning
confidence: 96%
“…as invariable anchor points in a sufficiently variable familiarization stream [25]. Furthermore, by 13 months of age, infants' knowledge of the functor-directionality of their native language impacts on the learning strategies they rely on to parse new input.…”
Section: Trends In Cognitive Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The science studies about the characteristics of language and patterns across languages is called typology [1][2][3][4]. Generally, language typology distinguishes two types of language [5]. Typology also explains a group of objects based on the similarity of basic properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%