2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.087
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

8-Lump kinetic model for fluid catalytic cracking with olefin detailed distribution study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the complex hydrodynamics and mixture, the lumping kinetic model has gained acceptability in description of an industrial FCC unit. For instance, the six lumped kinetic model has a feed, and five products, consisting of diesel, gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), dry gas, and coke, adequately represent the product distribution [16,17,19]. If all products deem directly from the cracking of the feedstock oil, the reaction rate or the kinetic model equations can be expressed as fellow:…”
Section: Simulated Industrial Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the complex hydrodynamics and mixture, the lumping kinetic model has gained acceptability in description of an industrial FCC unit. For instance, the six lumped kinetic model has a feed, and five products, consisting of diesel, gasoline, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), dry gas, and coke, adequately represent the product distribution [16,17,19]. If all products deem directly from the cracking of the feedstock oil, the reaction rate or the kinetic model equations can be expressed as fellow:…”
Section: Simulated Industrial Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of fresh FCC catalysts can require expensive laboratory or actual field tests, where feedstock disturbances or market demands could make the evaluation difficult. The first step is to assess the potential in cracking activity and yield selectivity, either for a standalone catalyst or for co-catalysts [15], and hydrothermal effect and metals deposition are two main factors that influence the catalyst deactivation for commercial FCC units [15][16][17][18]. Hydrothermal deactivation represents the equilibrium activity as a function of a regenerator bed temperature and regeneration bed flue gas water partial pressure, while metal deactivation reflects the influence of metal content on commercial equilibrium catalyst (E-Cat).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where k 0,i represents the frequency factor and E i is the activation energy. φ is the catalyst deactivation function due to coke deposition, which is given by 41 k t exp( ) where t os is the time-on-stream and k d is the catalyst deactivation coefficient, which depends on the operating temperature (T) and determined by…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the schematic flow diagram of a typical fluid catalytic cracking unit based on a "side-by-side" configuration [29]. The procedure of sensor location for an entire FCCU cannot be presented completely due to space limitations.…”
Section: Sensor Location In a Fccumentioning
confidence: 99%