Farmers’ Research in Practice 1997
DOI: 10.3362/9781780444956.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

8. Kuturaya: participatory research, innovation and extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The project used PREA to allow communities to identify their key problems and suggest potential solutions (Ellis-Jones et al ., 2004; Hagmann et al ., 1999). As a first stage in the PREA cycle, community analysis and social mobilization activities were undertaken with 30 communities in the three AEZs in southern Borno State, northeast Nigeria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The project used PREA to allow communities to identify their key problems and suggest potential solutions (Ellis-Jones et al ., 2004; Hagmann et al ., 1999). As a first stage in the PREA cycle, community analysis and social mobilization activities were undertaken with 30 communities in the three AEZs in southern Borno State, northeast Nigeria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long-term impacts of the participatory innovation development and extension approach in INRM cannot yet be fully quantified because large-scale assessment has not been finalized. However, the impacts up to 1996 have been qualitatively assessed and described (Hagmann et al 1997, Murwira et al 2000. We will present some of the key impacts.…”
Section: Results and Impacts Of Inrm Randdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Greater details of the evolution of this INRM approach are documented in Hagmann (1999) and Hagmann et al (1997Hagmann et al ( , 1998Hagmann et al ( , 1999.…”
Section: The Learning Case: Approach Development In Inrm Randd In Zimbamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participatory Research and Extension approach (PREA) was used to evaluate and promote ISC technologies and involved a four-stage process, including community analysis and mobilization, action planning, implementation through field experimentation, and sharing of experiences (Ellis-Jones et al, 2004; Hagmann et al, 1999). During the community analysis, problems were identified and prioritized by each innovation platform (IP) and action plans were agreed upon and implemented.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%