1984
DOI: 10.1093/jicru/os19.2.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

8. Electron Collision Stopping Powers at Low Energies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean energy loss depends on the mean excitation energy [11], which has only been measured in gaseous argon. We conservatively ascribe a ∼10% uncertainty on this value to account for possible differences due to the phase also observed in other materials [14]. The wire-sensitive thickness depends on the quantity of diffusion transverse to the electric field [12].…”
Section: Uncertainties On the Energy Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean energy loss depends on the mean excitation energy [11], which has only been measured in gaseous argon. We conservatively ascribe a ∼10% uncertainty on this value to account for possible differences due to the phase also observed in other materials [14]. The wire-sensitive thickness depends on the quantity of diffusion transverse to the electric field [12].…”
Section: Uncertainties On the Energy Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water has been recommended by the IAEA Code of Practice TRS-398 (Andreo et al 2000) and AAPM TG-253 (Fulkerson et al 2020) as the reference medium for the determination of the absorbed dose in kV photon beams. Therefore, in the present simulations the phantom considered was of liquid water with the composition recommended by ICRU Report 37 (Berger et al 1984) and the updated mean excitation energies and mass density given by ICRU Report 90 (Seltzer et al 2014).…”
Section: Monte Carlo Studymentioning
confidence: 99%