2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

8. Dynamic Networks and Behavior: Separating Selection from Influence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

15
911
2
13

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 809 publications
(941 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
15
911
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Complete descriptions of this method are given by Snijders, Steglich, and colleagues. [39][40][41] This approach affords majoradvantages over those based in classic regression analysis. The first of these is that stochastic actor-based methods allow researchers to directly model the complex dependencies between actors (ie, individuals) in a network.…”
Section: Social Network Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Complete descriptions of this method are given by Snijders, Steglich, and colleagues. [39][40][41] This approach affords majoradvantages over those based in classic regression analysis. The first of these is that stochastic actor-based methods allow researchers to directly model the complex dependencies between actors (ie, individuals) in a network.…”
Section: Social Network Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40 Inclusion of such network structural properties in the modeling of socially mediated phenomena represents a notable advancement in methodological rigor in that such structural properties (ie, statistical nonindependence between cases), when neglected, have been shown to lead to biased results. 40,41 Of particular interest in this study is the ability of stochastic actor-based modeling procedures to disentangle the twin forces of selection and influence. Selection refers to factors observed in our data that may influence a child' s friendship decision-making; these factors include structural properties such as those just named, but also may include actor attributes such as physical activity level, obesity status, gender, age similarity, etc.…”
Section: Social Network Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen to base our dynamic empirical analysis on the stochastic actor-oriented model of Snijders et al (2010). While we considered using the matched sample framework of Aral et al (2009), it is better suited for larger networks where node homophily rather than new tie formation is the alternative explanation for influence-based diffusion.…”
Section: The Co-evolution Of Democracy Trade Network and Digital Acmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for instance, in the cases of homophily (Lazarsfeld & Merton, 1964, McPherson et al , 2001 or focus constraint (Feld, 2000), cultural attributes and actors' attitudes were studied as predictors of structure (e.g., Robins et al , 2001bRobins et al , , 2001a. Furthermore, in other formal studies, structural ties were taken as predictors of cultural attributes and actors' attitudes (cf., Robins et al , 2001a; relevant statistical approaches for both cases are discussed by Robins et al , 2007, Steglich et al , 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%