Proceedings of 12th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP) 2022
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

704. The impact of sire on variation in methane production and dry matter intake in sheep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methane yield was not reported in the current study as PAC are a ranking tool for CH 4 that only gives an estimate of CH 4 output. Methane yield in the current study ranged from 9.9 to 13.33 g CH 4 /kg DMI and were similar to previously reported values measured using PAC ( O’ Connor et al, 2022 ; O’ Connor, 2024 ). Values in the current study were lower, however, than values reported using the sulphur hexafluoride technique (15.3 to 22.3 g CH 4 /kg DMI; Pinares-Patiño et al, 2011a ; Jonker et al, 2017 ) and respiration chambers (16 to 24.9 g CH 4 /kg DMI; Pinares-Patiño et al, 2011b ; Jonker et al, 2018 ); which is not expected given that it is comparing a 50 min measurement that is extrapolated up to give a grams per day value to a 24 h measurement period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Methane yield was not reported in the current study as PAC are a ranking tool for CH 4 that only gives an estimate of CH 4 output. Methane yield in the current study ranged from 9.9 to 13.33 g CH 4 /kg DMI and were similar to previously reported values measured using PAC ( O’ Connor et al, 2022 ; O’ Connor, 2024 ). Values in the current study were lower, however, than values reported using the sulphur hexafluoride technique (15.3 to 22.3 g CH 4 /kg DMI; Pinares-Patiño et al, 2011a ; Jonker et al, 2017 ) and respiration chambers (16 to 24.9 g CH 4 /kg DMI; Pinares-Patiño et al, 2011b ; Jonker et al, 2018 ); which is not expected given that it is comparing a 50 min measurement that is extrapolated up to give a grams per day value to a 24 h measurement period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%