2016
DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1602253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

70-Gene Signature as an Aid to Treatment Decisions in Early-Stage Breast Cancer

Abstract: BACKGROUNDThe 70-gene signature test (MammaPrint) has been shown to improve prediction of clinical outcome in women with early-stage breast cancer. We sought to provide prospective evidence of the clinical utility of the addition of the 70-gene signature to standard clinical-pathological criteria in selecting patients for adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODSIn this randomized, phase 3 study, we enrolled 6693 women with early-stage breast cancer and determined their genomic risk (using the 70-gene signature) and the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
1,289
4
52

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,461 publications
(1,361 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
16
1,289
4
52
Order By: Relevance
“…A supervised classification model was then generated after extensive feature selection these patients would ordinarily have been given chemotherapy, yet, since patients were classified as low-risk based on the gene signature, they were not given chemotherapy. The rate of 5-year survival was 94.7% in this clinically and genomic discordant risk group [51], suggesting that using the genomic risk predictor to identify low-risk patients might be clinically useful in recognising a target population that will have a good prognosis without chemotherapy, despite having contrary clinical indicators of high-risk disease.…”
Section: Commercially Available Mrna-based Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A supervised classification model was then generated after extensive feature selection these patients would ordinarily have been given chemotherapy, yet, since patients were classified as low-risk based on the gene signature, they were not given chemotherapy. The rate of 5-year survival was 94.7% in this clinically and genomic discordant risk group [51], suggesting that using the genomic risk predictor to identify low-risk patients might be clinically useful in recognising a target population that will have a good prognosis without chemotherapy, despite having contrary clinical indicators of high-risk disease.…”
Section: Commercially Available Mrna-based Diagnostic Testsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Data on exactly how good are the outcomes for women with higher clinical risk profiles but favorable gene expression profiles on hormones alone are still awaited for the ONCOTYPE-DX (from studies called TAILOR-RX for node-negative women and RX-PONDER for those with 1-3 involved nodes). The MINDACT trial has reported a 5-year rate of death or distant metastases of 5.3% for women with high clinical risk but low genomic risk by the Mammaprint assay [24]. This DDFS is clearly worse than that observed in the ''no chemotherapy'' cohort of SOFT, but was improved by only 1.5% by adding chemotherapy.…”
Section: Minor Issues With Applying Soft and Textmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Im Anschluss an eine adjuvante Chemotherapie ist ein Aromatasehemmer grundsätzlich zu erwägen, wenn sicher eine permanent postmenopausale Situation vorliegt [1]. Auch für den MP-Score liegen erste prospektive Daten mit einem Followup von knapp 5 Jahren bei Patientinnen mit 1-3 befallenen Lymphknoten vor [3]. Anhand dieser noch vorläufigen Daten kann bei niedrigem Risikoprofil nach MP bei Patientinnen mit 1-3 befallenen Lymphknoten auf eine adjuvante Chemotherapie verzichtet werden.…”
Section: Endokrine Behandlung Der Postmenopausalen Patientinunclassified