2022
DOI: 10.14361/9783839457528-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7. Soziale Orte in einer vulnerablen Gesellschaft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This article began from the assumption that face-to-face encounters are commonly seen as a prerequisite for social interactions that foster both personal well-being and social inclusion in terms of community building. Building on existing research on social places (Kersten et al, 2022) and attempts to classify places of encounter (Oldenburg, 1989;Soszyński et al, 2021), we proposed an integrative methodology that includes the voices of local inhabitants and is able to "map" places of encounter, reconstruct individual and locally specific attributions of meaning, and assess the role of such places in social inclusion. The mapping of places of encounter represents an integrative approach that brings together the often separately discussed roles of encounter for the individual, society and normative concepts such as community in one research design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This article began from the assumption that face-to-face encounters are commonly seen as a prerequisite for social interactions that foster both personal well-being and social inclusion in terms of community building. Building on existing research on social places (Kersten et al, 2022) and attempts to classify places of encounter (Oldenburg, 1989;Soszyński et al, 2021), we proposed an integrative methodology that includes the voices of local inhabitants and is able to "map" places of encounter, reconstruct individual and locally specific attributions of meaning, and assess the role of such places in social inclusion. The mapping of places of encounter represents an integrative approach that brings together the often separately discussed roles of encounter for the individual, society and normative concepts such as community in one research design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this idea remains marginal in academic as well as social discourse on places of encounter and meeting places. Rather, places of encounter are mainly perceived as institutionalized places that have a certain consistency and require a lot of organizational effort (Kersten et al, 2022; Soszyński et al, 2021), while accidental encounters have been considered rather marginal in practice as well as in academia. In the literature, various co-existing terms can be found on this topic, including, but not limited to places of encounter, places of interaction, meeting places or gathering places.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zusammenhalt in Form interpersonellen Vertrauens kann eher durch die Gelegenheit des Kontakts entstehen. Ein zentrales Argument hierfür liefert das Soziale-Orte-Konzept (Kersten et al 2022), das im Grunde besagt, dass es Orte der Begegnung braucht, an dem sich gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt überhaupt erst bilden kann. Soziale Orte können dabei Nachbarschafstreffs, Vereinshäuser usw.…”
Section: Einspruch: Heimat Und Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhaltunclassified
“…Social actors in remote and deprived rural areas face various challenges in many countries around the world [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. While the specific conditions and scale of the challenges vary from country to country, there are often commonalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public transport is also very limited [1]. A lack of communication within these communities is another common complaint owing to the disappearance of places for communication (e.g., the village pub, parish or school building) [2]. Although we live in an age of widespread digitalisation, the digital infrastructure in rural areas is often still poor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%