There is accumulating evidence that the capacity of lymphocytes to bind antigen specifically (1-6) is due to Ig on the cell surface: anti-Ig causes the transformation of lymphocytes (7-12) and other changes in membrane properties (13,14); anti-L chain and anti-Ig inhibit both binding of specific antigen and stimulation of cellmediated immune reactions by antigen (15-18); anti-Ig of allotype or class specificity binds to lymphocytes (19-23); "rosette" formation around lymphocytes occurs when hybrid antibody to both Ig and specific antigen is added along with red cells coated with antigen (24, 25); lymphocytes treated with anti-Ig form rosettes with Ig-coated red cells (26,27); and specific adherence of lymphocytes to antigen-coated columns is blocked by pretreatment of cells with anti-Ig serum (28). There is conflicting evidence, however, as to whether the major class of cell surface immunoglobulin on normal splenic lymphocytes is IgM (12,20) or IgG (7, 21), as well as the distribution of Ig on cells (20,21).In evaluating the above results, I t should be emphasized that the methodologies used rely on the capacity of anti-Ig antibody to make effective contact with antigenic determinants of the receptor. Such contact depends upon the presence of determinants on portions of the receptor available to anti-Ig antibody in the medium and retention of antigenicity when the receptor is bound to the plasma membrane. These problems may account for the several contradictory reports mentioned above and the finding that individual antisera directed against the same immunoglobulin can give conflicting results, presumably depending on differences in the specificities of the antisera (20,29).For these reasons we developed an approach in which surface Ig could be studied by standard immuno-and biochemical techniques after its removal from the celt surface (30).