7. Overcoming Disagreement – Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl on Strategies of Justifying Descriptive and Evaluative Judgments

Fricke, Christel

doi:10.1515/9783110325942.171

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Any destructive change in integrity (internal contradictions that disrupt the world of everyday life) is usually very painful for the individual with disabilities. The very normativity of human "everyday-home" individual reality accumulates the experience of many generations of history [13].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intersubjectivity levels in organising everyday social life of individuals with disabilities

Popov,

Muzyka,

Kholina

2023

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article institutionalises a variety of approaches to comprehension, interpretation and understanding of the concepts of constructing an inclusive society (society of inclusion) with a focus on the study of everyday reality of people characterised by various restrictions on the conditions of their life (limited needs, disabilities, persons with disabilities). It is shown that the use of concepts and categories of modern philosophy allows to integrate complexes of ideas about specificity of subjective time of people with disabilities in the world of everyday life of included society with priority use of phenomenological characteristics of intersubjectivity and intensional-temporal coordination. The concept of intersubjectivity is seen in the broad context of cognitive subject's constituting other subjects as conscious objects through intensionality, using internal experience, interpretation and comprehension of person's own individual being. The aim of the article is to investigate the formation of everyday life of individuals with disabilities in the space of levels of intersubjectivity of the inclusive society. The research methodology is based on philosophical, multidisciplinary and pedagogical complexes which allow demonstrating heuristic and expressive possibilities of conceptual apparatus used at different levels of intersubjectivity as a basic characteristic of subjective time of a person with disabilities in the inclusion society. The results and conclusions are of practical importance in solving socio-cultural and philosophical problems of conceptual and methodological nature. They show the peculiarities of application of temporal concepts in the context of constructing the social field of communication and life of individuals with disabilities.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Intersubjectivity levels in organising everyday social life of individuals with disabilities

Popov,

Muzyka,

Kholina

2023

E3S Web Conf.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Sugden ignores not only Smith but also the massive Smith scholarship stressing the role of sympathy-as-judgment (e.g., Montes and Schliesser 2006; Haakonssen 2006; Cockfield et al 2007; Hanley 2009; Fricke and Føllesdal 2012; Brown and Fleischacker 2014; Schliesser 2017). This literature was spawned by the above mentioned “Introduction” to the variorum edition of TMS that highlights the role of sympathy-qua-judgment 7…”

Section: The Primary Research Question: What Is the Nature Of Satisfa...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Does Friendship Stem From Altruism? Adam Smith and the Distinction Between Love-Based and Interest-Based Preferences

Khalil¹

2022

J Hist Econ Thought

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Friendship-and-love expresses musings about well-being—while the object of the musings, i.e., “well-being,” is the economist’s substantive satisfaction. Insofar as altruism is about well-being and not the musings, it cannot be subsumed under friendship-and-love. However, what is the basis of the difference between the economist’s substantive satisfaction and friendship-and-love? The answer can be found in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments, chapter 2: how “mutual sympathy” differs from substantive satisfaction. Smith scholars generally miss the uniqueness of “mutual sympathy” and, indeed, fold it under Smith’s “sympathy” (and “empathy”)—with one exception. Robert Sugden highlights the uniqueness of mutual sympathy. However, he goes to the other end, that is, he folds Smith’s sympathy-and-empathy under mutual sympathy. This paper aims to avoid the folding in either direction. Indeed, it argues that each fellow-feeling deals with a question that is orthogonal to the other. Mutual sympathy originates love-based sociality (friendship-and-love), which can be juxtaposed to interest-based sociality, i.e., substantive satisfaction, such as altruism. These genera of sociality are about the nature of satisfaction or preferences, and hence in contrast to sympathy-and-empathy that are basically about judgments. As judgments, sympathy-and-empathy are ultimately about the nature of decision making, irrespective of whether the decisions concerning love-based or interest-based preferences.

show abstract

Technology, Phenomenology and the Everyday World: A Phenomenological Analysis on How Technologies Mould Our World

Liberati

2015

Hum Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

7. Overcoming Disagreement – Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl on Strategies of Justifying Descriptive and Evaluative Judgments

Cited by 4 publications

References 15 publications

Intersubjectivity levels in organising everyday social life of individuals with disabilities

Intersubjectivity levels in organising everyday social life of individuals with disabilities

Does Friendship Stem From Altruism? Adam Smith and the Distinction Between Love-Based and Interest-Based Preferences

Technology, Phenomenology and the Everyday World: A Phenomenological Analysis on How Technologies Mould Our World

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About