Late-Breaking Oral Abstracts 2018
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307109.259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7 Outcomes of medically-treated patients with M2-segment middle cerebral artery occlusion. Results from the prospective multicentral international cohort study INTERRSeCT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DAWN [2], DEFUSE3 [3], and late window patients in ESCAPE [4] trials show the benefit of thrombectomy up to 24 h. Data from HERMES collaboration show benefit with thrombectomy even in patients with large ischemic core [(irrespective of whether evaluated on the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or CT perfusion (CTP)] and moderate to good collaterals [5,6]. While there remains no published data from randomized trials on more distal occlusions, evidence from quality registries on thrombectomy in sizable middle cerebral artery M2-segment occlusions suggests that thrombectomy is safe and effective [7][8][9][10][11]. The further incentive can be found in the dismal natural history of acute proximal occlusion and the low complication rate of thrombectomy, in trials and registries [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DAWN [2], DEFUSE3 [3], and late window patients in ESCAPE [4] trials show the benefit of thrombectomy up to 24 h. Data from HERMES collaboration show benefit with thrombectomy even in patients with large ischemic core [(irrespective of whether evaluated on the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) or CT perfusion (CTP)] and moderate to good collaterals [5,6]. While there remains no published data from randomized trials on more distal occlusions, evidence from quality registries on thrombectomy in sizable middle cerebral artery M2-segment occlusions suggests that thrombectomy is safe and effective [7][8][9][10][11]. The further incentive can be found in the dismal natural history of acute proximal occlusion and the low complication rate of thrombectomy, in trials and registries [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%