1963
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6468(08)70121-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7 Local Anaesthetics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 204 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thiamine and other substances.-A variety of other naturally occurring substances have been claimed to modify, usually antagonistically, the action of local anesthetics [see (108) ]. These include certain water-soluble vita mins, particularly thiamine; ·the amino acids, aspartic acid, tryptophan, leu cine, and cysteine'; the veratrum alkaloids ; and urea.…”
Section: Biochemical Aspects Of Local Anesthetic Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thiamine and other substances.-A variety of other naturally occurring substances have been claimed to modify, usually antagonistically, the action of local anesthetics [see (108) ]. These include certain water-soluble vita mins, particularly thiamine; ·the amino acids, aspartic acid, tryptophan, leu cine, and cysteine'; the veratrum alkaloids ; and urea.…”
Section: Biochemical Aspects Of Local Anesthetic Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These various aspects of local anesthetic action will be g iven particular emphasis in this review. Many other, perhaps equally important, aspects will be neglected, and the interested reader is there fore referred to the many comprehensive reviews on local anesthetics that have appeared in the last decade (4,14,24,25,56,73,94,104,106,108). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems therefore that acetylcholine stimulated muscarinic receptors sited on the smooth muscle fibres. Procaine displaced the dose-response curve to acetylcholine slightly to the right, an action which is best explained by its known anti-acetylcholine property (Sinha, 1953 ;Wiedling & Tegner, 1963).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%