2015
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307845.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7 Diagnostic accuracy of 12 lead ECG Q-waves as a marker of myocardial scar: validation with CMR: Abstract 7 Table 1

Abstract: Background Myocardial extracellular volume (ECV) can be estimated by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) using preand post-contrast T1 MOLLI maps. The age and sex associations with myocardial ECV in healthy mid-life adults are uncertain. Methods Healthy adults without any history of cardiovascular disease or treatment underwent contrast-enhanced CMR at 1.5 Tesla (Siemens MAGNETOM Avanto). T1 mapping with MOLLI was performed before and 15 min after contrast (0.15 mmol/kg gadoterate meglumine). ECV was esti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison to existing approaches Table 2 relates the performance of our models to that of applying the Selvester score (Selvester et al 1971;Selvester et al 1985), human-based ECG evaluation, and two SVM-based approaches. The measures of both our models deliver comparably high performance measures and reach (ECG-based model) or exceed human performance (combined model) as published by Asch et al (2006), Carpenter et al (2015), and Markendorf et al (2019).…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 60%
“…Comparison to existing approaches Table 2 relates the performance of our models to that of applying the Selvester score (Selvester et al 1971;Selvester et al 1985), human-based ECG evaluation, and two SVM-based approaches. The measures of both our models deliver comparably high performance measures and reach (ECG-based model) or exceed human performance (combined model) as published by Asch et al (2006), Carpenter et al (2015), and Markendorf et al (2019).…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 60%