Multilingual Practices in Language History 2017
DOI: 10.1515/9781501504945-007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

7. Code-switching in the long twelfth century

Abstract: In the field of historical code-switching research, English historical linguists have been particularly active, exploring medieval and modern data, but as the history of English provides an enormous range of material, it may not be surprising that they have thus far overlooked at least one important sub-period in the English Middle Ages. This is the period immediately following the Norman Conquest of 1066, when England became increasingly trilingual. This chapter is devoted to the long twelfth century, from th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also reflected in the materials used in this exploration: rather than investigating one text type or period, we demonstrate the breadth of Latin in English and its mediation to English readers by citing examples from a very heterogeneous set of sources, many of which we have utilized in earlier projects (see e.g. Nurmi et al 2018;Pahta and Nurmi 2006;Skaffari 2016Skaffari , 2018. They range from individual manuscripts to large electronic text corpora.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is also reflected in the materials used in this exploration: rather than investigating one text type or period, we demonstrate the breadth of Latin in English and its mediation to English readers by citing examples from a very heterogeneous set of sources, many of which we have utilized in earlier projects (see e.g. Nurmi et al 2018;Pahta and Nurmi 2006;Skaffari 2016Skaffari , 2018. They range from individual manuscripts to large electronic text corpora.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%