2004
DOI: 10.1097/00019605-200404000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

6q subtelomeric deletion: is there a recognizable syndrome?

Abstract: We report on a girl with an abnormal hybridization pattern for the subtelomeric fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probe panel showing deletion of the long arm telomeric region of chromosome 6. All other subtelomere DNA probes showed normal hybridization patterns. Metaphase cells analysed from cultures of peripheral blood revealed a normal female chromosome complement at the 650-band level. The deletion was further characterized using genomic microarray analysis. Clinical findings include: developmental… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to note that our two cases, like the other two patients more recently reported [Stevenson et al, 2004;Eash et al, 2005], present with abnormalities in the corpus callosum (agenesis or hypoplasia), an aspect which had never been highlighted before in cases presenting a similar deletion extent. This discrepancy may be due either to a more precise ascertainment of more subtle brain malformations in the recent years or to the genetic background.…”
Section: Phenotype Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is interesting to note that our two cases, like the other two patients more recently reported [Stevenson et al, 2004;Eash et al, 2005], present with abnormalities in the corpus callosum (agenesis or hypoplasia), an aspect which had never been highlighted before in cases presenting a similar deletion extent. This discrepancy may be due either to a more precise ascertainment of more subtle brain malformations in the recent years or to the genetic background.…”
Section: Phenotype Comparisonsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…For this reason, a thorough ophthalmologic evaluation in all patients with 6qter deletions was recommended. The two most recent cases reported [Stevenson et al, 2004;Eash et al, 2005], which presented an isolated 6q subtelomeric deletion, did not show any retinal problems; the authors suggest that the gene(s) responsible for the retinal abnormalities in 6q deletion patients is proximal to the breakpoint, localized in these patients in 6q27. Neither of our two patients presents retinal problems, and this observation seems to exclude the putative genes from the region distal to RP11-150P20.…”
Section: Phenotype Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The most striking example of this was the elucidation of the '1p36 deletion syndrome' (Shapira et al, 1997;Knight-Jones et al, 2000). This was followed by clinically identifiable phenotypes being put forward for a number of other subtelomeric imbalances, for example, 1qter syndrome, 2q37.3 monosomy, 3q29 microdeletion syndrome, 5q35.3 subtelomeric deletion syndrome, 6q subtelomeric deletion syndrome, subtelomeric 9q microdeletion syndrome, 14q terminal deletion syndrome, 19p13.3-pter subtelomeric deletion syndrome and 22q deletion syndrome (de Vries et al, 2001a;van Karnebeek et al, 2002;Heilstedt et al, 2003;Rauch et al, 2003;Wilson et al, 2003;Aldred et al, 2004;Stevenson et al, 2004;Stewart et al, 2004;Archer et al, 2005;Eash et al, 2005; van Bever et Willatt et al, 2005). In most cases these studies were aided by the detailed phenotypic characterisation of a series of patients with similar regions of imbalance.…”
Section: Identifying Clinical Phenotypes Associated With Subtelomericmentioning
confidence: 99%