Untitled

Vanek, Francis; Jackson, Peter L.; Grzybowski, Richard

doi:10.1002/sys.v11:2

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 93 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recognizing this issue, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) undertook an effort to examine ways that the human could be better represented as part of the total system, and created the NATO RTO HFM 155 Human View Workshop. The Human Views were intended to expand the NAF by documenting the unique implications of humans for system design (Handley & Smillie, 2008). The United States Department of Defense and the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence with industry partners developed a profile extending both UML and SysML to depict the DoDAF and the MODAF constructs.…”

Section: The Nato Architectural Framework (Naf) Human Factors Viewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To better understand the role of the human agent NATO proposed a set of human views look at various aspects of humans that may affect system performance. The NATO human views are HV-A Concept, HV-B Constraints, HV-C Functions, HV-D Roles, HV-E Human Network, HV-F Training, HV-G Metrics, and HV-H Human Dynamics (Handley & Smillie, 2008). The following subset of views are intended to allow architects to better understand the human-machine interactions in accordance with the NATO definitions (Handley & Smillie, 2008).…”

Section: The Nato Architectural Framework (Naf) Human Factors Viewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrated Human Factors Views in the Unified Architecture Framework

Hause¹,

Wilson

2017

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human beings are integral to today's complex systems of systems. Human behaviour, interactions, abilities, complexity, and limitations will have a dramatic effect on the successful realization of system capabilities. Therefore the human factors considerations need to be evaluated in conjunction with the overall systems engineering. Systems engineers need to address them upfront and throughout the system life cycle resulting in effective Human Systems Integration (HSI). Systems engineers are increasingly using Model Based System Engineering (MBSE) techniques to define systems requirements, behaviour, structure, interactions, etc. Typical architecture notations are the Systems Modeling Language (SysML) for modelling systems and the Unified Modeling Language (UML) Profile for DoDAF and MODAF (UPDM). The metamodels defining these notations contain implicit, but not explicit elements for defining how the human fits into the architecture. The Unified Architecture Framework (UAF) has standardized a set of Human Views (called Personnel Views in UAF) into its system of systems framework, allowing the Human aspects to be considered in conjunctions with the rest of the architecture. The UAF Personnel views will not be standalone, but like SysML will allow users to interface with specialty to analyse human aspects in both quantitative and qualitative ways. It is only by taking this integrated approach that systems can be fit for purpose by including the human impact and contribution to overall system performance. This paper will describe these views and how they fit into the overall architecture as well as how they can interact with a spectrum of human factors and architecture tools.

show abstract

Section: The Nato Architectural Framework (Naf) Human Factors Viewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Nato Architectural Framework (Naf) Human Factors Viewsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrated Human Factors Views in the Unified Architecture Framework

Hause¹,

Wilson

2017

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The human is not only the most important and unique system within a system of systems, but also potentially the weakest link and possibly the highest risk element in a system (Handley & Smillie, 2008;Madni, 2010). The human is also capable of exhibiting great ingenuity in unprecedented situations.…”

Section: Mbse Role In Analyzing the Hmimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Recognizing this issue, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) undertook an effort to examine ways that the human could be better represented as part of the total system, and created the NATO RTO HFM 155 Human View Workshop. The Human Views were intended to expand the NATO Architectural Framework (NAF) by documenting the unique implications of humans for system design (Handley & Smillie, 2008). With the emergence of SysML, The United States Department of Defense and the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence with industry partners developed a profile extending both UML and SysML to depict the DoD Architecture Framework (DoDAF) and the MoD Architecture Framework (MoDAF) constructs.…”

Section: Mbse Role In Analyzing the Hmimentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In an attempt to better understand the role of the human agent, the NATO proposed human views look at various aspects of humans that may affect system performance. The NATO human views are HV-A Concept, HV-B Constraints, HV-C Functions, HV-D Roles, HV-E Human Network, HV-F Training, HV-G Metrics, and HV-H Human Dynamics (Handley & Smillie, 2008). In particular the following subset of views are intended to allow architects to better understand the human-machine interactions in accordance with the NATO definitions (Handley & Smillie, 2008):…”

Section: Mbse Role In Analyzing the Hmimentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Analyzing Human Machine Interaction and Interfaces through Model Based System Engineering Practices

Orellana

Madni

2012

INCOSE International Symp

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract.As systems continue to grow in scale and complexity, human machine interactions and the human machine interface (HMI) become a crucial consideration in overall system design. In complex systems, humans are often part of the complex system as opposed to being just users of the system. The human mental model, work instructions, and procedures are key attributes that a system architect needs to analyze to ensure the success of the overall human-machine system. Model Based System Engineering (MBSE) techniques potentially offer new ways for system architects and engineers to conceptualize and analyze HMI requirements and use the findings to specify its design.

show abstract