2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3078-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate?

Abstract: The great potential of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with rPCa and BR was confirmed. PSA and PSAdt were valuable predictors of pathological (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT findings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

14
132
4
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
132
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Most recently, Perera et al presented a review of 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET, demonstrating a pooled detection rate of 76% for 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT (11), considerably exceeding the pooled 62% detection rate for 11 C-choline PET (12). However, most 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT studies have either evaluated an inhomogeneous patient population, including predominantly patients showing BCR after radical prostatectomy and including also a low proportion of patients after EBRT as well as progressive disease, or completely focused on the group of patients after radical prostatectomy (10,13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, Perera et al presented a review of 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET, demonstrating a pooled detection rate of 76% for 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT (11), considerably exceeding the pooled 62% detection rate for 11 C-choline PET (12). However, most 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT studies have either evaluated an inhomogeneous patient population, including predominantly patients showing BCR after radical prostatectomy and including also a low proportion of patients after EBRT as well as progressive disease, or completely focused on the group of patients after radical prostatectomy (10,13,14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this might influence the likelihood of response, it might also indicate a more indolent disease process in which an observational strategy may limit side effects without adversely affecting survival. Consistent with this hypothesis, PSA doubling time has also been shown to be a predictive factor for a positive PSMA PET/CT (27,28). An exception to the general rule that a negative scan implies either small volume or low-grade prostate cancer is the observation that neuroendocrine differentiation can be associated with low PSMA expression (29), and yet this is known to be an adverse prognostic group and can have low PSA levels (30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 54%
“…PSMA ligand PET imaging has proven to correlate highly with histopathological findings (16,17,19) and is more sensitive than computed tomographic-based 3D volumetric assessment for lymph node relapse after primary prostate cancer therapy (20). To our knowledge, there are no general recommendations for the optimal PSA detection threshold and there is always the risk of non-detection of metastases in patients with low PSA levels, although some data suggest a detection threshold of at least 0.83 ng/ml (21). In our analysis, the median PSA at the time of 68 Ga-PSMA ligand PET/CT was 2.75 ng/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%