Untitled

Abstract

PrePrintsAbstract Animals generally adjust their behavior in response to bodily state (e.g. size and energy reserves) to optimize energy intake in relation to mortality risk, weighing predation probability against starvation. Here we investigated whether brown trout adjust their behavior in relation to feeding history (energetic status) and body size during a major early-life selection bottleneck, when fast growth also appear to be important. We manipulated growth using different food ration schemes over two consecutive time periods (P1 = 12 days, P2 = 23 days), excluding social effects through individual isolation. During these experimental periods the fish were fed either high or low food rations in a crossed design. In behavioral trials following the treatment, where acute hunger levels were standardized among all treatments, fish that were initially fed high rations (P1) and thereafter low rations (P2) had on average 15-21% higher swimming activity than the other groups, but large within-treatment variation rendered only weak statistical support for the effect. Furthermore, fish on low ration during P2 tended to be more aggressive than fish on high ration. Size was related to behavioral expression, with larger fish being more active and aggressive. Swimming activity and active aggression were positively correlated, forming a behavioral syndrome in the studied population. Based on these behavioral traits we could also distinguish two behavioral clusters, one consisting of more active and aggressive individuals, and the other consisting of less active and aggressive individuals. This indicates that two behavioral strategies may exist in young brown trout.