2015
DOI: 10.1016/s1525-0016(16)34298-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

689. Defining Genome-Wide Off-Target Cleavage Profiles of CRISPR-Cas RNA-Guided Nucleases Using GUIDE-Seq

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In cases where the mismatched off-target has mismatches only in the PAM-distal region, off-targets containing mismatches at position 1 are likely to be prevalent. This information is consistent with a recent publication (31) and further supports the need to consider position 1 in crRNA design rules. More target/off-target sets will need to be tested to predict precise bioinformatic rules for off-targeting, however the rapid ability to test many synthetic crRNAs per gene target and some understanding of mismatch tolerance and are essential to triage designs for highly specific and functional crRNAs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cases where the mismatched off-target has mismatches only in the PAM-distal region, off-targets containing mismatches at position 1 are likely to be prevalent. This information is consistent with a recent publication (31) and further supports the need to consider position 1 in crRNA design rules. More target/off-target sets will need to be tested to predict precise bioinformatic rules for off-targeting, however the rapid ability to test many synthetic crRNAs per gene target and some understanding of mismatch tolerance and are essential to triage designs for highly specific and functional crRNAs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Considering that either on-target or off-target activity will strictly require a PAM, (thus limiting the vast number of possible 1-, 2-, and 3-base-mismatched off-targets to only the subset which occur in the genome adjacent to a PAM) and that only a small fraction of these possible sites, in context of the current study, show activity, our results support the conclusion that off-targeting is not as much of an impediment to the use of CRISPR-Cas9 as was initially suggested. Several methods have recently emerged that enable profiling of genome-wide offtarget cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 (31)(32)(33). While GUIDE-Seq may provide an approach to detect genome-wide off-target cleavage for single sgRNAs in a low throughput manner, our method allows detection of functional genome editing and a proxy method for off-targeting through numerous, unbiased mismatches to a crRNA with similar powerful sensitivity to these published methods but also in a high-throughput manner with respect to both targets and off-targets detected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, selection of targets with GC contents of about 50%-70%, and those with less or no base-pairing with the sgRNA sequence, is desirable. Use of target sequences with higher GC contents may potentially lead to a higher risk of off-targeting (Tsai et al, 2015), a critical issue in clinical research. However, for basic and applied research in plants, off-targeting may not be a critical problem, because the risk of off-targeting in plants by the CRISPR/Cas9 system may not be higher than that of the frequent somatic mutations that occur during the tissue culture-based transformation or other mutagenesis treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Off-target analysis was performed based on the GUIDE-seq methodology (52). The workflow was described previously (40).…”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%