66-2: Comparison of Flat and Curved Monitors: Eyestrain Caused by Intensive Visual Search Task

Luo, Gang; Chen, Ying; Doherty, Amy; Li, Rui; Shi, Cong; Wang, Shuhang; Lê, Hoài Bắc; Peli, Eli

doi:10.1002/sdtp.10839

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 5 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some of these displays may have a slight curvature that adds the benefit of more light from the display being directly aimed at the viewer – this has the potential of helping to limit image distortion, improving viewing angles, and decreasing eye strain. [ 49 50 ] For many, screen size, generally given as a diagonal measurement in inches, is the most important specification considered when choosing a display. However, one must take into account the aspect ratio to get a better idea of the actual display size and shape, as a 49”, 32:9 display will be a very wide, narrow rectangle as compared to a still rectangular, but much taller, 43” 16:9 display.…”

Section: Ommon D Isplay S mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Display Characteristics and Their Impact on Digital Pathology: A Current Review of Pathologists’ Future “Microscope”

Abel

Ouillette

Williams

et al. 2020

Journal of Pathology Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital displays (monitors) are an indispensable component of a pathologists’ daily workflow, from writing reports, viewing whole-slide images, or browsing the Internet. Due to a paucity of literature and experience surrounding display use and standardization in pathology, the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) has currently restricted FDA-cleared whole-slide imaging systems to a specific model of display for each system, which at this time consists of only medical-grade (MG) displays. Further, given that a pathologists’ display will essentially become their new surrogate “microscope,” it becomes exceedingly important that all pathologists have a basic understanding of fundamental display properties and their functional consequences. This review seeks to: (a) define and summarize the current and emerging display technology, terminology, features, and regulation as they pertain to pathologists and review the current literature on the impact of different display types (e.g. MG vs. consumer off the shelf vs. professional grade) on pathologists’ diagnostic performance and (b) discuss the impact of the recent digital pathology device componentization and the coronavirus disease 2019 public emergency on the pixel pathway and display use for remote digital pathology. Display technology has changed dramatically over the past 20 years and continues to change at a rapid rate. There is a paucity of published studies to date that investigate how display type affects pathologist performance, with more research necessary in order to develop standards and minimum specifications for displays in digital pathology. Given the complexity of modern displays, pathologists must become better informed regarding display technology if they wish to have more choice over their future “microscopes.”

show abstract

Section: Ommon D Isplay S mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pathologists viewing digital images should bear in mind the effects size and resolution can have on the appearance of familiar histological and anatomical structures. [ 50 ]…”

Section: Ommon D Isplay S mentioning

confidence: 99%