Z = 63 - 100
DOI: 10.1007/10667325_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

65-Terbium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This solves one paradox which arises in understanding the result obtained for asymptotically flat spaces in the canonical General Relativity. It is shown [7,8] that (18) then we will get zero result due to the closed constraint algebra of the General Relativity. The third step in our revision of the Poisson bracket formula is dictated by purely mathematical reasons.…”
Section: The Poisson Bracketmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This solves one paradox which arises in understanding the result obtained for asymptotically flat spaces in the canonical General Relativity. It is shown [7,8] that (18) then we will get zero result due to the closed constraint algebra of the General Relativity. The third step in our revision of the Poisson bracket formula is dictated by purely mathematical reasons.…”
Section: The Poisson Bracketmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these cases do not cover all types of the physically interesting boundary behaviour. Often one has to deal with a slow decay of the gauge or gravitational fields at spatial infinity [7,8], with nonperiodical boundary conditions for a media moving in a finite domain [9] or for integrable models [10][11][12]. Can we still use the Hamiltonian approach in such cases?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%