1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01408195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

63Cu and65Cu Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our value is in strong disagreement with the value of −0.78(13) from [14]. However, it is in reasonable agreement with the calculated values 0.71 using the [15,23], µ lit [13,14,24,25] and theoretical calculations using GXPF1 [10,16] FPD6 interaction [18] and 0.51 using the GXPF1 interaction [10,14]. The departure of this value from 1 is an extra indication of a non-pure p 3/2 nuclear configuration (see Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our value is in strong disagreement with the value of −0.78(13) from [14]. However, it is in reasonable agreement with the calculated values 0.71 using the [15,23], µ lit [13,14,24,25] and theoretical calculations using GXPF1 [10,16] FPD6 interaction [18] and 0.51 using the GXPF1 interaction [10,14]. The departure of this value from 1 is an extra indication of a non-pure p 3/2 nuclear configuration (see Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…This is due to the improved total resonance line width (3.5 GHz vs. 4.5 GHz), the larger separation of the hyperfine levels of the 3d 9 4s4p 4 P 1/2 level compared to the 3d 10 4p 2 P 1/2 level and the high number of independent measurements. Supported by the good agreement on the stable isotopes, the consistency of the ratio of the two hyperfine parameters and based on the precise knowledge of the magnetic moment of 63 Cu [24,25], the moments of 57,59,65 Cu are extracted, as detailed in [15], from both atomic levels. The results are given in Table I.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The paramagnetic shielding for CuCl, however, is substantial and has experimentally been determined by Lutz et al [37,38] to be 63 σ iso para (CuCl) = −1500 ppm with an error of about 10 ppm. As it was done in [36] we introduce the notation of paramagnetic field modification k K ii L = − k σ ii para .…”
Section: Orbital Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(11) The paramagnetic shielding for CuCl, however, is substantial and has experimentally been determined by Lutz et al 38,39 to be 63 σ iso para (CuCl) = −1500 ppm with an error of about 10 ppm. As it was done in Ref.…”
Section: E Orbital Shiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%