1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022460828246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the multi-agency and multi-professional setup of the GSH, it is crucial to consider the capability building process and implementation experiences across organisations and professional groups [ 41 ]. We aim to elicit the perspectives and experiences of professional stakeholders playing critical roles in the development and implementation of the programme through in-depth interviews [ 42 ] and focus group discussions (FGDs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the multi-agency and multi-professional setup of the GSH, it is crucial to consider the capability building process and implementation experiences across organisations and professional groups [ 41 ]. We aim to elicit the perspectives and experiences of professional stakeholders playing critical roles in the development and implementation of the programme through in-depth interviews [ 42 ] and focus group discussions (FGDs).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This involved eliciting views and perspectives from all professional stakeholders who played critical roles in and were significantly affected by the Living Matters initiative, of which included physicians, nurses, social workers, and allied health workers hired specifically for the role of an ACP coordinator. This multi-level framework of inquiry enables a systemic understanding of ACP development and implementation through the interpretive lens of different stakeholder groups that belong to the diverse contextual systems of health and social care (Ochoa-Arias, 1998).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este proceso de acción colectiva, un aspecto no menor es el modo cómo esos intereses son definidos y construidos a lo largo del tiempo y que permite, en general, entender que los procesos organizacionales, sin importar cuánto de diseño intencional posean, reflejan un quehacer social e histórico que permite caracterizar a la organización de acuerdo al contexto sociocultural en el cual ellas se insertan (Crozier y Friedberg, 1980). Se entiende que en el proceso de construcción del significado social de la organización incide el devenir histórico que permite a la organización ser lo que se despliega de acuerdo a las diferentes racionalidades que conviven en ese espacio (Ochoa-Arias, 1998;MacClean et al, 2020;Hargadon & Wadhwani, 2022). Pero aún más, se trata de desentrañar cómo la organización y las ideas que las constituyen, sostienen y prolongan en el tiempo van constituyendo una trama histórica-ontológica en el cual la organización "encaja" con un determinado orden ontológico entendido históricamente (Fuenmayor, 2016).…”
Section: Enfoque Sistémico Interpretativo Y Estudios Histórico-organi...unclassified