As fases ativas NiS 2 e Fe 2 O 3 suportadas em β-carbeto de silício (SiC) com média área específica mostraram alta atividade, seletividade e estabilidade na oxidação direta do H 2 S a enxofre elementar. Os catalisadores foram testados a temperaturas que variaram da temperatura ambiente, no caso do Ni em reator de leito gotejante, até temperaturas superiores à do ponto de orvalho do enxofre, no caso do Fe em reator de leito fixo. Para ambos os casos, foi proposta a formação de uma fase bastante ativa de oxisulfeto de Ni ou de Fe, formada pela oxidação do NiS 2 e pela sulfuração do Fe 2 O 3 . A ausência de microporosidade no suporte contribuiu à alta seletividade do catalisador. A grande estabilidade ao carregamento de enxofre sólido, apresentada pelos catalisadores suportados em SiC em temperaturas inferiores a 100 °C, foi explicada pela maneira especial da deposição do enxofre, a qual depende do papel da água presente na reação e do caráter heterogêneo (hidrofílico e hidrofóbico) da superfície do suporte.The NiS 2 and Fe 2 O 3 active phases supported on medium surface area β-silicon carbide (SiC) showed high activity, selectivity and stability in the direct oxidation of H 2 S into elemental sulfur. The catalysts were tested under a large range of temperatures, from room temperature using Ni (tricklebed reactor) to over-dewpoint temperatures using Fe (fixed bed reactor). For both cases, the formation on stream of a Ni and Fe oxysulfide high active phase was proposed by oxidation of NiS 2 and sulfidation of Fe 2 O 3 , respectively. The absence of microporosity in the support contributed to the high selectivity into sulfur. At low temperatures (below 100 °C), the high stability of β-SiC supported catalysts towards the solid sulfur loading was explained by a specific mode of sulfur deposition, involving the role of water in the feed and the heterogeneous nature of the SiC surface, being partly hydrophilic and hydrophobic.Keywords: silicon carbide, catalyst support, sulfur recovery, H 2 S oxidation, hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity
IntroductionThe removal of hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) from the acid gases generated by oil refineries or natural gas plants is a crucial aspect of air pollution control, due to ever increasing standards of efficiency required by the environmental protection pressure. The general trend is to selectively transform H 2 S into elemental sulfur and steam, by the wellknown modified Claus process.1 (equation 1) 2 H 2 S + SO 2 ↔ 3/n S n + 2 H 2 OAccording to the different running processes, typical sulfur efficiencies are only 90-96 % for a two stage reactor unit and 95-98 % for a three stage process, due to the thermodynamic limitations of the Claus reaction.2 This means that for a conventional sulfur plant, the SO 2 emissions may amount to many thousand tons per year released into the atmosphere, and a large amount of sulfur compounds remains in the tail gas, i.e., SO 2 (≈ 6000 ppm), H 2 S (≈ 12000 ppm), COS and CS 2 (≈ 700 ppm). New catalysts and processes for the tail-gas treatment of the industri...