Untitled

Prpić, Katarina

doi:10.1023/a:1016046819457

Cited by 169 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…There were significantly more women among the excluded SIOP members without any publications female (60 %), but male psychologists had also written an average of thirteen publications, and female psychologists only eight. This rather conservatively estimated effect 6 is consistent with much previous research in psychology and other fields (e.g., D'Amico et al 2011;Garg and Kumar 2014;Larivière et al 2013;Malouff et al 2010;Prpić 2002). Given the gender balance in SIOP and the attractiveness of psychology for female students (e.g., D'Amico et al 2011), our clear finding can be considered as surprising and a future societal challenge if viewed from the standpoint that society should achieve (at least more) gender equality.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…Overall, the results of these studies suggest that men outperform women (e.g., Garg and Kumar 2014;Larivière et al 2013;Malouff et al 2010;Prpić 2002). However, other studies were unable to replicate the male advantage, at least not on all performance Scientometrics indicators (e.g., Borrego et al 2010;Powell et al 2009;Sotudeh and Khoshian 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 84%

“…A considerable number of studies have addressed the number and the impact of publications of women and men in several fields, but the results have been inconclusive: Although the majority of papers have found differences in favor of men (e.g., Garg and Kumar 2014;Larivière et al 2013;Prpić 2002;Puuska 2010), others have documented differences in favor of women (e.g., Powell et al 2009), and others still have found no differences or mixed effects (e.g., Borrego et al 2010;Joy 2006;Long 1992;Sotudeh and Khoshian 2014). Furthermore, it has been questioned whether gender differences have been disappearing over recent years (van Arensbergen et al 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These papers have covered many different fields, ranging from material sciences (Mauleón and Bordons 2006) to construction research (Powell et al 2009), invasion ecology (Heidi Prozesky and Boshoff 2012), and social sciences in general (e.g., van Arensbergen et al 2012). Furthermore, researchers have obtained data for researchers in many countries, including Canada (e.g., Larivière et al 2011), Croatia (Prpić 2002), Finland (Puuska 2010), India (Garg and Kumar 2014), Russia (Paul-Hus et al 2015), South Africa (Heidi Prozesky and Boshoff 2012), Spain (e.g., Barrios et al 2013), and the US (e.g., Joy 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Questions about gender differences in the workplace usually attract much attention-but often generate more heat than light. To examine gender differences in several facets of scientific productivity and impact, a quantitative, scientometric approach is employed. Analyzing a sample of industrial and organizational psychologists (N authors = 4234; N publications = 46,656), this study raises both questions and concerns about gender differences in research, by showing that female and male I-O psychologists differ with regard to publication output (fewer publications authored by female researchers), impact (heterogeneous, indicator-dependent gender differences), their publication career courses (male researchers' periods of active publishing last longer and show longer interruptions), and research interests (only marginal gender differences). In order to get a glimpse of future developments, we repeated all analyses with the student subsample and found nearly no gender differences, suggesting a more gender-balanced future. Thus, this study gives an overview over the status quo of gender differences in an entire psychological sub-discipline. Future research will have to examine whether these gender differences are volitional in nature or the manifestation of external constraints.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 84%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The main effect cuts in at the level of access to high quality university education. Women come from somewhat higher classes, in the sense of having a larger fraction of fathers who are themselves university graduates in each age group, in a Croatian sample (Prpic 2002). The obvious explanation is that a family doesn't systematically choose to educate its daughters unless it is doing rather well.…”

Section: Janet From Earth or Stationary At The Center Of The Universementioning

confidence: 99%

Astrophysics in 2002

Trimble

Aschwanden

2003

PUBL ASTRON SOC PAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. This has been the Year of the Baryon. Some low temperature ones were seen at high redshift, some high temperature ones were seen at low redshift, and some cooling ones were (probably) reheated. Astronomers saw the back of the Sun (which is also made of baryons), a possible solution to the problem of ejection of material by Type II supernovae (in which neutrinos push out baryons), the production of R Coronae Borealis stars (previously-owned baryons), and perhaps found the missing satellite galaxies (whose failing is that they have no baryons). A few questions were left unanswered for next year, and an attempt is made to discuss these as well.

show abstract

Gender and authorship trends in rhinology, allergy, and skull‐base literature from 2008 to 2018

Halderman

Rao

Desai-Markowski

et al. 2021

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: A recent analysis suggested potential narrowing of the gender gap in research productivity in the field of rhinology. This analysis did not, however, provide insight into how the genders are represented in the rhinologic literature.This study aimed to evaluate 11 years of literature to evaluate for gender differences in authorship position, collaborations, category and content of research, citations, and funding to gain perspective on how gender and authorship has changed over time. Methods:Authorship data for all articles on rhinologic subject matter published between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2018 in four otolaryngology journals was collected. The gender of authors was determined by protocol. Category and content of research and funding status/source were additionally obtained. Results: Data were collected from 2666 articles. Gender of 14,510 authors was determined. Female authors accounted for 23% of the overall authors and male authors accounted for 77%. Female first authorship increased significantly over time, but there was no change in female senior authorship. The percentage of female authors steadily increased over time, whereas male authorship decreased slightly. Mixed gender teams were shown to be increasing in frequency. Women published more than expected in basic science and allergy and less than expected in skull base. On funded studies, women were significantly underrepresented as senior authors.

show abstract

Untitled

Cited by 169 publications

References 28 publications

Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?

Are there gender differences among researchers from industrial/organizational psychology?

Astrophysics in 2002

Gender and authorship trends in rhinology, allergy, and skull‐base literature from 2008 to 2018

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About