6.	A Correlational inferences from Times Higher Education 2017 World University Ranking

Baykal, Ali

doi:10.17261/pressacademia.2017.371

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 3 publications

(3 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It was also observed that independence of the national judicial system from the effects of the government, individuals, or companies was a significant predictor. A similar conclusion was made by Baykal (2017), who found a positive, mediumlevel, and significant relation among the international outlook, citations, and research of a country. Citations are a measure of the references made to a study and its authors.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Indicators Affecting the International Outlook of Universities

Acar¹

2022

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, the variables that affect the International Outlook of Universities are examined. The international outlook was treated as a dependent variable. Teaching, research, citation and industry income, GCI, critical thinking in teaching, freedom of the press, judicial independence, HDI, GNI, Gini coefficient, gender inequality index, unemployment youth, and share of seats in parliament (% held by women) were treated as independent variables. Fourteen indicators measured by three different organizations which are UNDP, WEF, and THE were selected. The data used in the research were from 57 countries and 1,133 universities. Therefore, for data analysis, a two-level hierarchical linear model was conducted. The differentiation in the international outlook scores of universities by country was found to be significant. The empirical outcomes of this study will make important contributions to both top-level decision-makers and students who will select a university to study.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 81%

Indicators Affecting the International Outlook of Universities

Acar¹

2022

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Acar (2022), the international perspective unlocks the technological potential for countries and presents research opportunities. Baykal (2017) confirms a positive and significant relationship between the international perspective, citations, and a country’s research. University reputation is the basis for recruiting students and faculty members at the international level (Soysal et al ., 2022).…”

Section: University Management and Leadershipsupporting

confidence: 55%

“…University reputation is the basis for recruiting students and faculty members at the international level (Soysal et al ., 2022). Research has emphasized management and leadership components (Acar, 2022; Baykal, 2017; Mazidi et al ., 2019; Parsa Ziabari and Shirvani, 2012; Polat et al ., 2019). Therefore, the results of the management and leadership component were in line with the studies above.…”

Section: University Management and Leadershipmentioning

confidence: 99%

Higher education managers’ perception of university reputation components: a model for Middle Eastern countries

Romiani,

Ghoraishi Khorasgani,

Norollahee

2024

IJEM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeNowadays, universities increasingly consider reputation as a key component for improving quality and rankings. A positive reputation opens doors to added value and diverse opportunities. This paper aims to explore Middle Eastern higher education managers' perceptions of university reputation components.Design/methodology/approachGiven the significance of this concept in Middle Eastern universities, a descriptive phenomenological qualitative approach is adopted to identify these key components. The study includes interviews with university managers, and data are collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed thematically.FindingsThe findings reveal that, from the perspective of higher education managers, university reputation is influenced by four main components: university management and leadership, quality and performance, identity and image and social responsibility. These components are tailored to the context of Middle Eastern countries.Practical implicationsPractical implications are clearly laid out in the form of four key themes for higher education managers in Middle Eastern countries to manage reputation.Originality/valueThe study’s outcomes can be used as a guide for university managers in developing countries to change the situation in their favor and achieve great success in the competitive condition of universities by planning and making policies in this direction. Also, the managers of higher education in the Middle Eastern countries can take advantage of the components of this study to improve the quality and quantity of their universities and take an important step towards increasing the university’s reputation at the international level.

show abstract

6. A Correlational inferences from Times Higher Education 2017 World University Ranking

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

Indicators Affecting the International Outlook of Universities

Indicators Affecting the International Outlook of Universities

Higher education managers’ perception of university reputation components: a model for Middle Eastern countries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About