1989
DOI: 10.1049/el:19890833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

6–34 GHz offset phase-locking of Nd:YAG 1319 nm nonplanar ring lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The output of the optical filter is combined with the output of a second laser (80 mW distributed feedback laser, EM4 Inc., nm) using another 50/50 coupler and the composite signal is directed onto the photodiode under test. As in other techniques [16], [19], the second laser is sufficiently offset in wavelength from the first that there is no beating between the two at the photodiode. Therefore, the second laser acts only as a source of average photocurrent allowing the output RF power and DC photocurrent to be varied independently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The output of the optical filter is combined with the output of a second laser (80 mW distributed feedback laser, EM4 Inc., nm) using another 50/50 coupler and the composite signal is directed onto the photodiode under test. As in other techniques [16], [19], the second laser is sufficiently offset in wavelength from the first that there is no beating between the two at the photodiode. Therefore, the second laser acts only as a source of average photocurrent allowing the output RF power and DC photocurrent to be varied independently.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison we also measure the same photodiode using a pair of offset phase-locked Nd:YAG lasers at approximately 1320 nm [16]. The experimental parameters remain fixed-the fundamental excitation is at GHz, the average photocurrent is held at 10 mA and the measurements are made for both V and V. Table II summarizes the results of our measurements.…”
Section: B Example Nonlinearity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main drawback of optical self-heterodyning is the strong influence of laser phase noise and optical frequency variation on the purity and stability of the generated mm-wave signal. The optical phase-locked loop (OPLL) has been used to reduce the phase noise (Williams et al, 1989;Gliese et al, 1992). Hence the optical self-heterodyning is a costly solution for photonic generation of mm-wave signal because it needs a special laser system.…”
Section: Optical Self-heterodyningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, the hereby generated carriers must comply with the noise requirements of the microwave systems, in which they are to be used. Such carriers can be generated with a narrow band heterodyne optical phase locked loop (OPLL) based on either solid state lasers, such as the Nd:YAG [2], or semiconductor lasers with external cavities [3], [4] or with negative electrical feedback [5]. The use of semiconductor lasers without external linewidth narrowing arrangements would, however, be much more attractive due to compactness and potential for monolithic opto-electronic integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%