2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

6:2 Fluorotelomer sulfonate aerobic biotransformation in activated sludge of waste water treatment plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
162
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
13
162
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) methods, initially established for the determination of PFCAs in environmental matrices, were widely adapted in soil, sediment and activated sludge-incubation systems [26,[35][36][37]45]. Specifically, solid samples were first soaked in an organic solvent (methanol, acetonitrile, or methyl tert-butyl ether), then constantly shaken at 150-200 rpm for from several hours up to 5 days and then centrifuged to obtain supernatant.…”
Section: Sample-extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dispersive solid-phase extraction (DSPE) methods, initially established for the determination of PFCAs in environmental matrices, were widely adapted in soil, sediment and activated sludge-incubation systems [26,[35][36][37]45]. Specifically, solid samples were first soaked in an organic solvent (methanol, acetonitrile, or methyl tert-butyl ether), then constantly shaken at 150-200 rpm for from several hours up to 5 days and then centrifuged to obtain supernatant.…”
Section: Sample-extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The selectivity is not influenced by the presence of organic solvents, such as methanol, acetonitrile and MTBE, which made the purification procedure easily coupled to both DSPE and IPE methods, as mentioned in sub-section 2.2. The protocol was simple and robust for quantitative recovery of fluorotelomers-and EtFOSE-based precursors and transformation products [29,30,[35][36][37]. Zhang et al [46] demonstrated low matrix effects for PFCAs (C5-C10), PFSAs (C4,6,8), FOSAs and FOSAAs in the range -13% to +24% in digested sewage-sludge extract using the Envi-Carb clean-up procedure.…”
Section: Sample Concentration and Clean-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, PFHxA was the predominant PFAS in the DPF1B wastewater, whereas its use was not declared by the manager of the F1 facility. Even though PFHxA is known as an end-stage metabolite of 6:2 FTSA (Wang et al 2011), its presence in DPF1B wastewater needs to be screened elsewhere and particularly in the F2 facility discharge.…”
Section: Discharges Of F1 Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFHpA identity was confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis along with other transformation products (see Figure SI-2 of the Supporting Information). It is worth noting that PFHpA was not detected in soil, sediment, and activated sludge dosed with 6:2 FTOH or 6:2 FTSA [F(CF 2 )CH 2 CH 2 SO 3 ], [19][20][21]24 further confirming that PFHpA did not come from 6:2 FTOH biotransformation. Even-number PFBA was not observed, and PFHxA accounted for 3.8 mol % by day 91 ( Figure 3B and Table 1), less than half of that in soil dosed with 6:2 FTOH.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%