2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

6:2 Fluorotelomer alcohol biotransformation in an aerobic river sediment system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
93
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
93
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Release of 6:2 FTOH from production application may steadily increase and, thus, become a predominant FTOH in the environment (Ritter 2010). A study of 6:2 FTOH biotransformation in an aerobic river sediment system has revealed that the primary biotransformation of 6:2 FTOH was rapid with a half-life time of <2 days and formed polyfluorinated acids after 100 days (Zhao et al 2013). Seawater concentrations determined in this work may suggest that FTOHs are mainly released from old FTOH-based (C≥10) products in use in Europe.…”
Section: Pfass In Seawatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Release of 6:2 FTOH from production application may steadily increase and, thus, become a predominant FTOH in the environment (Ritter 2010). A study of 6:2 FTOH biotransformation in an aerobic river sediment system has revealed that the primary biotransformation of 6:2 FTOH was rapid with a half-life time of <2 days and formed polyfluorinated acids after 100 days (Zhao et al 2013). Seawater concentrations determined in this work may suggest that FTOHs are mainly released from old FTOH-based (C≥10) products in use in Europe.…”
Section: Pfass In Seawatermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aeration is achieved by pumping ambient air into the headspace when the oxygen content is below 10%. One or two C18 SPE cartridges were inserted into the headspace as the conduit and to capture volatile parent and potential volatile transformation products [25,27]. To mimic continuous exchange of PFASs in surface soil or active sludge with surrounding air, flow-through systems using purge-and-trap methods were used to study 6:2 FTOH and 6:2 polyfluoroalkylphosphate biotransformation [26,28].…”
Section: Test Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, biotransformation of fluorotelomer-based substances often involves cleavage of functional groups (e.g., ester, ether, urethane) to form FTOHs, which are then further converted to FT aldehyde (FTAL), FT unsaturated carboxylic acids (FTUCAs), FT ketone and FT secondary alcohol (sFTOH), and x:3 fluorotelomer acids (F(CF2)nCH2CH2COOH, n = 3-7) [23,24]. Sediment/soil-bound residues formed from precursors and related transformation products with highly absorptive properties (e.g., FTOHs and x:3 acids) are not quantifiable without optimized sampleextraction methods and proper analytical procedures [25,26]. Furthermore, sophisticated analytical instrumentation, such as highresolution mass spectrometry (HRMS), is often needed to identify low levels of potential novel transformation products.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PFHpA identity was confirmed by high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis along with other transformation products (see Figure SI-2 of the Supporting Information). It is worth noting that PFHpA was not detected in soil, sediment, and activated sludge dosed with 6:2 FTOH or 6:2 FTSA [F(CF 2 )CH 2 CH 2 SO 3 ], [19][20][21]24 further confirming that PFHpA did not come from 6:2 FTOH biotransformation. Even-number PFBA was not observed, and PFHxA accounted for 3.8 mol % by day 91 ( Figure 3B and Table 1), less than half of that in soil dosed with 6:2 FTOH.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The decreased 5:3 acid level after day 14 may reflect increased tendency for 5:3 acid to be bound to soil and was therefore more difficult to recover even with solvent extraction and postprocessing with base extraction and EnviCarb cleanup procedures. 20,35 Transient polyfluoroalkyl acids, such as 6:2 FTCA, 6:2 FTUCA, and 5:3 Uacid, were detected at low concentrations during 6:2 FTI biotransformation in soil ( Figure 3C), likely because of their fast further degradation to downstream biotransformation products, as was observed in 6:2 FTOHdosed soil. 19 Low levels of 6:2 FTOH (<1 mol %) were observed from days 1 to 58 in soil dosed with 6:2 FTI because of 6:2 FTOH subsequent rapid biotransformation.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%