2002
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-2-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Abstract: BackgroundStomata respond to vapour pressure deficit (D) – when D increases, stomata begin to close. Closure is the result of a decline in guard cell turgor, but the link between D and turgor is poorly understood. We describe a model for stomatal responses to increasing D based upon cellular water relations. The model also incorporates impacts of increasing levels of water stress upon stomatal responses to increasing D.ResultsThe model successfully mimics the three phases of stomatal responses to D and also re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). The model response of gs to VPG described by Eamus & Shanahan (2002) resembles our model in eqn. 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The model response of gs to VPG described by Eamus & Shanahan (2002) resembles our model in eqn. 5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that tropical trees had a conservative water use strategy when exposed to short-term drought [36,37]. High sensitivity of canopy stomatal control to VPD has been linked to conditions of water stress [38,39]. This result could be explained by consequent drought stress in S. wallichii and C. lanceolata during the dry season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, based on UV values, first day measurements should be more stressful than the second. Decrease in relative humidity (RH), in other words, the increase of vapor pressure difference between plant and air expedites water lose due to transpiration and again, the plant enters to a state of water stress (Eamus and Shanahan, 2002). The average RH of M1 and M2 (14:00-15:00) are 48.14% and 62.23% respectively, thus first day measurements should be more stressful than the second based on the RH as well.…”
Section: Lwp Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%