5G for Remote Areas: Challenges, Opportunities and Business Modeling for Brazil

Abstract

Globalization, digitalization, and urbanization are progressing at a fast pace in cities and regions across the world. New technologies and innovations typically reach urban regions first, where Return on Investment (ROI) tends to be higher than in remote or rural areas, which are characterized by low population densities, low potential revenues, and large distances to urban clusters and societal service. This process has consistently increased the digital urban-rural gap. As an example, the Fifth Generation of Mobile Network (5G) has recently started to be rolled out, starting in the cities. Many challenges remain to bring broadband connectivity to the rural and remote regions. Particularly in Brazil, there is still a big digital gap between urban and rural areas. Urban areas have an internet penetration of around 65% while the rural figure is at just 34%. There are also important differences concerning the geographical location in the country. The North and Northeast regions of Brazil have lower internet penetration than the South, Southeast, and Center. In this paper, we present opportunities for connecting the unconnected in Brazil by defining a new alternative and scalable business model to deploy networks in ultra-low density areas. We present an analysis of show stoppers, rural opportunity sizing, business case, including deployment model for a 5G network, costs incurred, and generated revenues. A central element to bring scalability and sustainability into the business model for rural connectivity is the association between a Mobile Network Operator (MNO) and Rural Mobile Infrastructure Operator (RMIO), in which RMIOs run their network on a slice of a network that is connected to incumbent operators. Profit and Loss (P&L) analysis shows that a fair split of the value generated between the MNO and RMIO can be achieved.INDEX TERMS 5G, remote areas mobile network, business model.

Surveying 5G Techno-Economic Research to Inform the Evaluation of 6G Wireless Technologies

“…For example, one hope is that by having rural network operators run a single slice of a network, this may reduce the costs for deployment, making a more scalable and viable business model. It is hoped this innovation exhibits greater financial sustainability over the long term compared to existing approaches [166]. Thus, a situation develops where there are both infrastructure providers and service providers, with neither necessarily providing both infrastructure and services, but specializing in one area [167].…”

5G: Next Generation Mobile Wireless Technology for A Fast Pacing World

“…These devices are called user equipment (UE) [6], [14] and these are smartphones, tablet, and in this modern era now include autonomous cars, drones, smart logistics, robots, smart home and appliances, and so on. The cellular network consists of two main subsystems; mobile core [2], [15], and radio access network (RAN) [4]. The 5G architecture is depicted in Fig 1.…”

Infrastructure sharing model to connect the unconnected in rural areas

“…According to the literature, there is no standard for infrastructure sharing, but it is considered a practical and promising solution for reducing deployment costs [4]. The main advantages of infrastructure sharing are the cost bene its [11,12]. But it is also driven by the migration to new technologies and the deployment of mobile broadband [13].…”