2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2008.08.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

56-P: Correlation of HLA donor specific antibody (DSA) titers with the luminex mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For TRALI mitigation, however, detection of antibodies of fixed low‐titer and/or narrow specificity may not appreciably benefit blood recipients but could dramatically shrink the donor base and lead to dangerous apheresis PLT shortages. There appears to be a general correlation between the Luminex NBG ratio and both the MFI (which appears to be related to antibody titer) and the PRA (representing the breadth of donor antigen recognition) 35,36 . As one sets progressively lower cutoff ratios, a few additional strong sera and more low to midlevel MFI/PRA sera are detectable (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For TRALI mitigation, however, detection of antibodies of fixed low‐titer and/or narrow specificity may not appreciably benefit blood recipients but could dramatically shrink the donor base and lead to dangerous apheresis PLT shortages. There appears to be a general correlation between the Luminex NBG ratio and both the MFI (which appears to be related to antibody titer) and the PRA (representing the breadth of donor antigen recognition) 35,36 . As one sets progressively lower cutoff ratios, a few additional strong sera and more low to midlevel MFI/PRA sera are detectable (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…First, for each alloexposed donor serum, we noted the highest single antigen bead's MFI. The MFI has been positively correlated with antibody titer 35,36 . Second, we calculated a virtual PRA value for each serum sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation