51.8 Medical Education in the Time of Covid-19: A Literature Review on E-Learning

Wu, Alexander; Zeshan, Muhammad

doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2020.08.418

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The COVID‐19 pandemic thrust students enrolled in traditional graduate health programs into unexpected levels of online learning. Although previously deemed at least equally effective as traditional learning (Cook et al, 2008; Lima et al, 2019; McCall et al, 2018; McCutcheon et al, 2015; Pei & Wu, 2019), online learning following the arrival of the COVID‐19 pandemic was often a source of frustration for students and instructors (Abbasi et al, 2020; Aziz et al, 2020; Garris & Fleck, 2020; Loda et al, 2020; Singal et al, 2020; Weber & Ahn, 2021; Wu & Zeshan, 2020). These frustrations may derive from fundamental differences between students electing online versus traditional learning environments, which are documented in the literature (Harris & Martin, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Let teachers decide: The effects of matching and mismatching students' online lecture preference with lecture participation

Ladwig

Berg‐Poppe

Ikiugu

et al. 2023

Applied Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Efforts to tailor instruction to match students' purported learning style continue to be used in higher education despite evidence challenging their value. Students were matched and mismatched to their self‐reported online learning preference to investigate the impact on academic outcomes. A total of 114 graduate health students were randomly assigned to an online lecture either matching or mismatching their previously reported preference (synchronous or asynchronous lecture participation). All students took the same multiple‐choice examination following the lecture. Independent t‐test analysis revealed no significant differences between students who were matched and mismatched to their participation preference. Asynchronous groups achieved significantly higher scores than synchronous groups. Analysis via two‐way ANOVA revealed no significant interaction between method of participation and compatibility with learning preference on examination scores. Based on the results of this study, method of participation impacted examination performance; however, matching or mismatching to students' stated learning preference did not impact performance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Let teachers decide: The effects of matching and mismatching students' online lecture preference with lecture participation

Ladwig

Berg‐Poppe

Ikiugu

et al. 2023

Applied Cognitive Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(Monk et al, n.d.), suggested in their study about online learning materials which is well-organized, relevant , encouraged self-learning and time management should assist other schools that wish to teach in blended learning. (Wu & Zeshan, 2020), Students cited several advantages to e-learning, including the availability of material and ease of communication. And it will be related to their parents as well.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blended Learning Modality in the New Normal Inputs Localized Learning Management System Proposal

Villasenor

2022

IJMABER

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Blended learning is the combination of online distant learning being used in the schools. In the city where connectivity is proven, there are students who can adapt and yet there are also students who do not have a connectivity. In this way problem arises. We asked parents about this platform and from the parents themselves agreed from the school survey favored the digital modular learning. But in other localities preferred other modalities of learning. A lot of research involves teachers but seldom on the parents’ side. This is the researcher’s attempt to hear from the side of the parents and be a contributor to the effectiveness of Blended learning modality in Rizal High School. This study aimed to determine the Blended Learning Modality in the new normal and propose an input localized learning management system in the school. Specifically, it sought to answers the following problems: 1) what is the profile of parents’ respondents in terms of the following variables: Age; Educational background; Type of Internet connection; Gadget Access at home? 2) What is the assessment of respondents in the blended learning modality of the school in terms of the following variables: Platform & Support and Governance and Challenges encountered in the blended learning modality by the group of respondents? 3.) Is there significant relationship in the assessment of parents towards blended learning modality in terms of type of internet connection they have at home? 4. What proposal from the parents as inputs in the localized blended learning modality of Rizal High School? The descriptive method of research employed in this study. The subjects of the study were the parents at Rizal High School primarily the researcher’s handled section.

show abstract

Research trends in e-learning practices for postgraduate medical education: A systematic review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

51.8 Medical Education in the Time of Covid-19: A Literature Review on E-Learning

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Let teachers decide: The effects of matching and mismatching students' online lecture preference with lecture participation

Let teachers decide: The effects of matching and mismatching students' online lecture preference with lecture participation

Blended Learning Modality in the New Normal Inputs Localized Learning Management System Proposal

Research trends in e-learning practices for postgraduate medical education: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About