2009
DOI: 10.1155/2009/834239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

50Hz Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields Enhance Protein Carbonyl Groups Content in Cancer Cells: Effects on Proteasomal Systems

Abstract: Electromagnetic fields are an assessed cause of prolonging free radicals lifespan. This study was carried out to investigate the influence of extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields on protein oxidation and on the 20S proteasome functionality, the complex responsible for the degradation of oxidized proteins. Caco 2 cells were exposed, for 24–72 hours, to 1 mT, 50 Hz electromagnetic fields. The treatment induced a time-dependent increase both in cell growth and in protein oxidation, more evident in the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is possible to argue that the decrease of cell proliferation following ELF-EMF exposure could be related to actin filaments rearrangement, since actin polymerization is one of the mechanisms regulating formation of contractile ring in cytokinesis (Lacy-Hulbert, 1998;Blank, 2007). There are quite a few studies analyzing the effects of ELF-EMF on different cell lines, which showed that ELF-EMF treatment in the early stages accelerated cellular proliferation in a time-dependent manner (Wolf, 2005;Manni, 2002;Eleuteri, 2009). Cells that were exposed to 100 Hz showed different behavior and aberrant bundles of F-actin appeared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to argue that the decrease of cell proliferation following ELF-EMF exposure could be related to actin filaments rearrangement, since actin polymerization is one of the mechanisms regulating formation of contractile ring in cytokinesis (Lacy-Hulbert, 1998;Blank, 2007). There are quite a few studies analyzing the effects of ELF-EMF on different cell lines, which showed that ELF-EMF treatment in the early stages accelerated cellular proliferation in a time-dependent manner (Wolf, 2005;Manni, 2002;Eleuteri, 2009). Cells that were exposed to 100 Hz showed different behavior and aberrant bundles of F-actin appeared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the proliferation response has been investigated by a scarce number of studies, most of which applied magnetic flux densities above the values of 500 µT and 100 µT proposed by ICNIRP [12] for protection of the workers and the general public, respectively, against exposure to 50-Hz MF. As a whole, the results of these studies have been considered inconsistent and contradictory, since they have reported proliferative effects [13,14], antiproliferative responses [15][16][17] or no effect [18]. It has been proposed that such inconsistency could be due to the fact that the MF-induced biological responses are influenced by a number of biological factors, like the genetic characteristics or differentiation status of the cells, or physical factors, like some field parameters or the chronological pattern of exposure [8,[19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date there is no general agreement on the specific primary biological targets of power frequency MFs, on the biophysical and chemical basis of the MF interactions, nor to which extent the reported in vitro bioeffects may be indicative of a human susceptibility to these fields. Concerning potential targets related to cancer risk, ELF MFs have been shown to alter gene and protein expression (1618) as well as intracellular calcium concentration and apoptosis rates (1923) and to induce oxidative stress (2426) and DNA damage (2731). The interest in the potential adverse effects of power frequency MFs has also been focused on the possibility that these fields may influence tumor promotion by increasing the rate of cell proliferation and/or modifying the activity of molecules implicated in their regulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%