2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2053-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

50 years of space research in Europe: a bibliometric profile of the European Space Agency (ESA)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can examine these bibliometric studies in various fields of knowledge such as business and management [37][38][39], environmental sciences [40,41] and earth sciences [42]. Other studies have focused on the institution's evaluation [43,44], scientific journals [45][46][47], the scientific production evolution by regions [48][49][50][51] or countries [24,25,52,53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can examine these bibliometric studies in various fields of knowledge such as business and management [37][38][39], environmental sciences [40,41] and earth sciences [42]. Other studies have focused on the institution's evaluation [43,44], scientific journals [45][46][47], the scientific production evolution by regions [48][49][50][51] or countries [24,25,52,53].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aims to undertake a bibliometric survey of the digital humanities research. To achieve this aim, several research questions were addressed and traced to specific bibliometric indicators (Eito-Brun and Rodríguez, 2016). The bibliometric data analysis schema is shown in Table I.…”
Section: Analysis Schemamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is built upon previous bibliometric approaches for related efforts: intellectual structures comprised of identifying the knowledge base and research topics and main contributors were identified from bibliometric data and indicators covering different aspects (Zhu et al, 2015;Eito-Brun and Rodr ıguez, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%