Names and Naming 2016
DOI: 10.21832/9781783094929-008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5. Signs of/on Power, Power on/of Signs: Language-Based Tourism, Linguistic Landscapes and Onomastics on Norfolk Island

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the above reasons, CLLs should be designed and placed to make recreational zones more relaxing, emotionally evocative, aesthetically pleasing, healthy, interesting or ecological [23]. In creating CLLs for recreational zones, elements that can be represented innovatively include indigenous languages [60], the shape of distinct local species [48], famous proverbs [61], images of traditional handicrafts (such as Chinese paper-cutting) [35], local traditional writing [18], and famous calligraphy [27], among others.…”
Section: Functions and Construction Of Creative Linguistic Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the above reasons, CLLs should be designed and placed to make recreational zones more relaxing, emotionally evocative, aesthetically pleasing, healthy, interesting or ecological [23]. In creating CLLs for recreational zones, elements that can be represented innovatively include indigenous languages [60], the shape of distinct local species [48], famous proverbs [61], images of traditional handicrafts (such as Chinese paper-cutting) [35], local traditional writing [18], and famous calligraphy [27], among others.…”
Section: Functions and Construction Of Creative Linguistic Landscapesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyzing the global practices of commercial use of toponyms, Basik (2018) distinguishes between two dominant groups of subjects (public authorities and business), three main strategic toponymic practices (use of existing toponym, creation of a new toponym, acquisition or lease of toponym) and three types of place name commodification (infrastructural, gentrification -led and tourist). In particular, these are opportunities and practices of vending the rights to name infrastructure objects in order to generate income for their construction and maintenance (Basik 2018 andRose-Redwood et al 2019a), development of thematic and linguistic tourism (Mair 2009 andMühlhäusler andNash 2016), creation of artificial geocultural spaces (Hopkins 1990, Gottdiener 1997and Zhao et al 2019, transformation of urban space in order to increase the demand for real estate and symbolic marking of social and property status (Alderman 2008, Vuolteenaho and Ainiala 2009, Sokolova 2016, Madden 2018and Sotoudehnia and Rose-Redwood 2018.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, in the cases where studies have taken an interest in more rural locations, they have been concerned with far more remote landscapes (e.g., Pietikäinen et al 2011, on villages in the arctic). Such is the case even with studies on island locations, Mühlhäusler and Nash (2016), for example, discuss the linguistic landscape and onomastics of Norfolk Island in relation to tourism and power relations reflected on signs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%