DOI: 10.1130/2016.2516(06)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5. Morphometric analysis of cave patterns using fractal indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the sophisticated structural complexity of speleological objects, we suggest that proposed numerical methodology may be useful for parameterization purposes due to introducing new quantitative parameters characterizing morphology of three-dimensional cave-mazes. As an example of the similar, quantitative characterization of cave morphology, based on image-processing, fractal dimension calculations, and the lacunarity indices, can be found in the recent review work of Kambesis et al (2015). Obtained values of fractal dimension were equal to 2.6488, and 2.6792, for the Wind Cave, and the Lechuguilla Cave, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Despite the sophisticated structural complexity of speleological objects, we suggest that proposed numerical methodology may be useful for parameterization purposes due to introducing new quantitative parameters characterizing morphology of three-dimensional cave-mazes. As an example of the similar, quantitative characterization of cave morphology, based on image-processing, fractal dimension calculations, and the lacunarity indices, can be found in the recent review work of Kambesis et al (2015). Obtained values of fractal dimension were equal to 2.6488, and 2.6792, for the Wind Cave, and the Lechuguilla Cave, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The prob lem in ves ti gated be longs par tially within re search into fractal prop er ties of karst (Curl, 1986;Laverty, 1987;ChilÀs, 1988;Feder, 1988;Havlin and Ben-Avraham, 2002;Maramathas and Boudouvis, 2006;Pardo-Igúzquiza et al, 2014, Kambesis et al, 2015 and partly re fers to the au thors' pre vi ous works (Andreychouk et al, 2013;Blachowicz and Andreychouk, 2016).…”
Section: Fenglin and Fengcong Karst Fenglin And Fengcong Karst In Conmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…And, stream caves usually form in regions where there are connections between non-carbonate basement rock and overlying carbonate rock, where allogenic recharge feeds a cave stream that rests on the non-carbonate basement rock. Stream caves are formed by freshwater dissolution generated as a consequence of epigenic recharge and usually feature branching drainage patterns [26][27][28]. The complexity of stream cave patterns ranges between that of the littoral pattern and flank-margin pattern [26].…”
Section: Data Presentation Analysis and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%