2016
DOI: 10.1177/1078155216647202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5-fluorouracil toxicity in the treatment of colon cancer associated with the genetic polymorphism 2846 A>G (rs67376798)

Abstract: Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer in Europe. Most antineoplastic regimens in first-line treatment involve 5-fluorouracil or oral prodrug capecitabine, combined with other antineoplastic agents such as oxaliplatin or irinotecan. It is well known that 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine are agents that can be toxic in cases of decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity because this enzyme is the main limiting factor in the metabolism of both agents. In this paper, we describe the case of a p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…About 66 and 61% of stage II and III colon and rectal patients underwent further treatments with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, respectively (12). These treatments have many side effects due to their unspecificity and cytotoxicity toward any cells that are growing and dividing (13,14). Furthermore, 54% of patients relapse even after neoadjuvant treatment (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…About 66 and 61% of stage II and III colon and rectal patients underwent further treatments with adjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy, respectively (12). These treatments have many side effects due to their unspecificity and cytotoxicity toward any cells that are growing and dividing (13,14). Furthermore, 54% of patients relapse even after neoadjuvant treatment (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para la segunda variante de mayor relevancia rs67376798, González-Perera et al [13], indicaron que esta variante se ha relacionado con una disminución del 30% al 70% de la actividad de DPYD. De la misma manera, observaron que los pacientes presentaron neutropenia, mucositis y diarrea.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Systemic chemotherapy is the primary treatment for metastatic CRC . Administration of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, mainly irinotecan or oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin or capecitabine (FOLFIRI/FOLFOX or CAPIRI/CAPOX regimens), is still the main strategy for CRC treatment. , However, these drugs have many side effects, due to their lack of specificity and cytotoxicity toward normal cells. , Although some FDA-approved targeted drugs, such as the anti-VEGF family inhibitors fruquintinib and regorafenib, the anti-EGFR antibody (Ab) cetuximab, and the anti-VEGFR Ab bevacizumab, are used in clinical applications, the efficacy of VEGFR/EGFR-targeting drugs is poor, and its adverse effects, especially drug resistance, are difficult to manage. , In addition, exploiting the immune system is a novel and promising approach in cancer treatment. , However, therapies employing only immune checkpoint inhibitors, represented by the anti-PD-1 Ab, have primarily benefited a small portion of MSI-H (high microsatellite instability) CRC patients and do not elicit responses in 90% CRC patients who were associated with microsatellite stability (MSS) . MSS-CRC represents the low T cell-inflamed gene signature along with the low tumor mutational burden (TMB) as the markers for placing MSS-CRC in the category of “cold” immunity. , Although the anti-PD-1 Ab can upregulate the cytotoxic effect of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) by releasing the exhaustion, the unsatisfactory therapeutic effect of the anti-PD-1 Ab for MSS-CRC may be due to the “cold” tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) of lacking CTLs .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%