2001
DOI: 10.1002/j.2334-4822.2001.tb00525.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5: Faculty Learning Communities: Change Agents for Transforming Institutions into Learning Organizations

Abstract: In my 20yearsiffaculty development, I havefoundfaculty learning communities to be the mosteffective programsfor achievingfaculty learning and development. In addition, these communities buildcommunication across disciplines, increase faculty interest in teaching and learning, initiate excursions into the scholarship ofteaching, andfoster civic responsibility. They provide a multifaceted.flexible, and holistic approach tofaculty development. They change individuals, and, over time, they change institutional cul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
61
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
61
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Characteristics of good mentors include strong communication and listening skills (Galbraith, 2001). Academic staff working collaboratively to enhance their teaching while building peer networks represents the core of professional learning communities (Cox, 2001). The same author also stresses the need for university instructors to communicate effectively as well as provide time for collaboration and cross-disciplinary interests in order to ensure quality community development.…”
Section: International Journal Of Learning and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics of good mentors include strong communication and listening skills (Galbraith, 2001). Academic staff working collaboratively to enhance their teaching while building peer networks represents the core of professional learning communities (Cox, 2001). The same author also stresses the need for university instructors to communicate effectively as well as provide time for collaboration and cross-disciplinary interests in order to ensure quality community development.…”
Section: International Journal Of Learning and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implications of this for CoPs in academe have not been explored in depth. Instead, research has tended to focus on how academic institutions can extract value from CoPs, in order to enhance performance and/or encourage professional development (Cox, 2001;Kitchen, Parker, & Gallagher, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These refer to the local, national and/or international context, where the underlying pedagogical assumptions, values, and critical motivational factors that occur when designing a responsive faculty certificate program are afforded attention and sensitivity (Cox, 2001(Cox, , 2003Diamond, 1998;Green & Kreuter, 1999;Guskey & Sparks, 1996;Richlin & Cox, 2004;Rust, 1998). This can be achieved by conducting a comprehensive needs assessment (e.g., polling faculty participants' pool, assessing comparable faculty certificate programs, and the larger institutional context in which a program is situated) in order to craft a program that maximizes available resources and responds to the diverse needs and circumstances of the learning context (Hubball & Poole, 2004;Wenger, 1998).…”
Section: Program Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%