2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.05.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

5:08107. Transient reduced mineral density associated with BMP-enhanced spinal fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there is firm evidence for high fusion rates with the use of rhBMP-2, its use has also been associated with the risk of early osteolysis, which could negatively affect endplate integrity and increase the rate of spacer subsidence or displacement. 21,22 Furthermore, we report significant improvements in PROMs despite including multilevel fusions in a relatively morbid patient population with a high rate of obesity (50%) and previous lumbar procedures (44%). Reoperation rates (10%) were comparable to a prospective, randomized cohort treated with lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Although there is firm evidence for high fusion rates with the use of rhBMP-2, its use has also been associated with the risk of early osteolysis, which could negatively affect endplate integrity and increase the rate of spacer subsidence or displacement. 21,22 Furthermore, we report significant improvements in PROMs despite including multilevel fusions in a relatively morbid patient population with a high rate of obesity (50%) and previous lumbar procedures (44%). Reoperation rates (10%) were comparable to a prospective, randomized cohort treated with lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, BMP‐2 has a short half‐life in vivo and is rapidly cleared by the bloodstream. [ 11 ] For successful bone repair, long‐term presence of BMP‐2 at the defect site is desired, for which a high concentration of BMP‐2 is typically administered, increasing cost and leading to ectopic/heterotopic bone formation, [ 12,13 ] vertebral bone resorption (osteolysis), [ 14 ] nerve root irritation, and/or edema. [ 15 ] Therefore, a scaffold that delivers BMP‐2 slowly but steadily in minute quantities over a longer period is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cranial bone defects arise due to injuries inflicted through trauma, infection, encephalic and maxillofacial surgeries, and concentration of BMP-2 is typically administered, increasing cost and leading to ectopic/heterotopic bone formation, [12,13] vertebral bone resorption (osteolysis), [14] nerve root irritation, and/or edema. [15] Therefore, a scaffold that delivers BMP-2 slowly but steadily in minute quantities over a longer period is desirable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these complications have been theorized to result secondarily to an inflammatory response to BMP. [7][8][9][10][11][12] In conjunction with these reports, other studies have correlated complication frequency and severity to use of higher BMP doses and attributed nerve root injury and radiculitis to application of BMP near neural structures. [13][14][15] Nonetheless, most studies have been underpowered, and many have contradicted one another, resulting in varying recommendations regarding the use of BMP in TLIF surgeries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%