2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6349(09)72032-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4LBA Final results of the randomized phase III CHARTWEL-trial (ARO 97-1) comparing hyperfractionated-accelerated vs conventionally fractionated radiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant difference in local control and overall survival was reported between the CHARTWEL arm and the conventional fractionation arm 299. [1+] …”
Section: Section 3: Radical Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant difference in local control and overall survival was reported between the CHARTWEL arm and the conventional fractionation arm 299. [1+] …”
Section: Section 3: Radical Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the results from the CHARTWEL study where the dose was escalated to 60 Gy failed to show improvement in local control feeding through to any overall survival benefits 27 .…”
Section: Van Baardwijk Et Al Have Performed a Systematic Review That mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in outcomes reported for CHART and CHARTWEL could be a matter of statistical chance, but factors relating to the overall length of the treatment schedule may also be in play as induction chemotherapy was routinely given prior to radiotherapy in the CHARTWEL study 27 . In addition, subgroup analysis 28 from this study does point toward improved outcomes for the accelerated schedule in populations of patients with the larger tumours where you might expect to see the most benefit.…”
Section: Van Baardwijk Et Al Have Performed a Systematic Review That mentioning
confidence: 99%