2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D phase contrast flow imaging for in-stent flow visualization and assessment of stent patency in peripheral vascular stents – A phantom study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent phantom study showed that in-stent flow quantification varies depending on the type of stent used; however, a covered TIPS stent was not assessed (32). Future phantom studies are needed to assess this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent phantom study showed that in-stent flow quantification varies depending on the type of stent used; however, a covered TIPS stent was not assessed (32). Future phantom studies are needed to assess this issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it was shown by Karacozoff et al 25 that the imaging of the surpass FDS was safe but was altered by artifacts. However, Bunks et al showed that 4D flow imaging could be used to measure intra-stent flow in an in vitro experiment using different types of peripheral stents 24. They also showed that quantitative and qualitative assessment of the in-stent flow was reliable and could be used even in pathological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that endovascular implants are related to metal artifacts and signal void issues depending on the metallic composition of the alloy 23. However, Bunks et al experimentally showed that 4D flow imaging could be used to measure intra-stent flow in different types of peripheral stents 24. Karacozoff et al 25 reported that surpass NeuroEndograft FDS-related artifacts may be problematic if the region of interest is in the same area or close to the implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aside from resolution constraints, magnetic resonance imaging–based techniques for in vivo flow quantification in stents create considerable material-dependent artifacts that may inhibit quantitative analysis near the stent configuration. 23 Contrast-enhanced, high-frame-rate, ultrasound-based techniques (echoPIV) could prove to be a convenient modality to quantify the in- and outflow of stent configurations. Until now, echoPIV techniques have been used only in superficial vessels and cardiac applications in a research setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%