2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

4D List Mode-based PET/CT Target Delineation in Tomotherapy of Liver Tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of 3 CCTs ( n = 461) showed that, there was no serious toxicity associated with HT and similar interventions, while mild toxicity caused by HT was lower than that caused by IMRT and 3D‐CRT; the 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates after HT were all higher than those after IMRT. viii Liver cancer: the results of 8 observational studies ( n = 403) showed that, there was little difference of the effect between HT and comparative measures. The 1‐ and 2‐year survival rates after HT for liver cancer were 50.1–87.5% and 14.9%, respectively; and the median survival time was 12.3–22.5 months ( N = 6; n = 356).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results of 3 CCTs ( n = 461) showed that, there was no serious toxicity associated with HT and similar interventions, while mild toxicity caused by HT was lower than that caused by IMRT and 3D‐CRT; the 1‐, 2‐, and 3‐year survival rates after HT were all higher than those after IMRT. viii Liver cancer: the results of 8 observational studies ( n = 403) showed that, there was little difference of the effect between HT and comparative measures. The 1‐ and 2‐year survival rates after HT for liver cancer were 50.1–87.5% and 14.9%, respectively; and the median survival time was 12.3–22.5 months ( N = 6; n = 356).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 145 original studies ( n = 6992) were included in the analysis (mainly including CCTs and observational studies) (Table ). Fourteen types of cancer (82%) were assessed in the present study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%